The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework
Open accessAbstract
Environmental and societal problems related to energy use have spurred the development of sustainable energy technologies, such as wind mills, carbon capture and storage, and hydrogen vehicles. Public acceptance of these technologies is crucial for their successful introduction into society. Although various studies have investigated technology acceptance, most technology acceptance studies focused on a limited set of factors that can influence public acceptance, and were not based on a comprehensive framework including key factors influencing technology acceptance. This paper puts forward a comprehensive framework of energy technology acceptance, based on a review of psychological theories and on empirical technology acceptance studies. The framework aims to explain the intention to act in favor or against new sustainable energy technologies, which is assumed to be influenced by attitude, social norms, perceived behavioral control , and personal norm. In the framework, attitude is influenced by the perceived costs, risks and benefits, positive and negative feelings in response to the technology, trust, procedural fairness and distributive fairness. Personal norm is influenced by perceived costs, risks and benefits, outcome efficacy and awareness of adverse consequences of not accepting the new technology. The paper concludes with discussing the applicability of the framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
Cited by
Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: a review and research agenda
Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010 · Cited by 1,301
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016) · Climate Policy · doi:10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240 · Cited by 965
Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.10.004 · Cited by 722
Wang, S., Wang, J., Lin, S., & Li, J. (2019) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.040 · Cited by 253
Public perception of carbon capture and storage: A state-of-the-art overview
Tcvetkov, P., Cherepovitsyn, A., & Fedoseev, S. (2019) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02845 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 525-531
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2154018430
- Cited by
- 1,143
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 61.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
- The paper
- Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.