The DOI matches its Crossref record; 117 of the 117 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies
Open accessAbstract
The lack of broad public support prevents the implementation of effective climate policies. This article aims to examine why citizens support or reject climate policies. For this purpose, we provide a cross-disciplinary overview of empirical and experimental research on public attitudes and preferences that has emerged in the last few years. The various factors influencing policy support are divided into three general categories: (1) social-psychological factors and climate change perception, such as the positive influences of left-wing political orientation, egalitarian worldviews, environmental and self-transcendent values, climate change knowledge, risk perception, or emotions like interest and hope; (2) the perception of climate policy and its design, which includes, among others, the preference of pull over push measures, the positive role of perceived policy effectiveness, the level of policy costs, as well as the positive effect of perceived policy fairness and the recycling of potential policy revenues; (3) contextual factors, such as the positive influence of social trust, norms and participation, wider economic, political and geographical aspects, or the different effects of specific media events and communications. Finally, we discuss the findings and provide suggestions for future research.Policy relevancePublic opinion is a significant determinant of policy change in democratic countries. Policy makers may be reluctant to implement climate policies if they expect public opposition. This article seeks to provide a better understanding of the various factors influencing public responses to climate policy proposals. Most of the studied factors include perceptions about climate change, policy and its attributes, all of which are amenable to intervention. The acquired insights can thus assist in improving policy design and communication with the overarching objective to garner more public support for effective climate policy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
Chakravarti, D., Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1997) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3151869 · Cited by 7,141
(1999) · Western CEDAR (Western Washington University) · Cited by 3,944
The Theory of Environmental Policy
Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1988) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173513 · Cited by 2,845
Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity
Hulme, M. (2009) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511841200 · Cited by 2,563
The Theory of Environmental Policy
Crocker, T. D., Randall, A., Baumol, W. J., & Oates, W. E. (1976) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3145303 · Cited by 2,272
Climate Change Risk Perception and Policy Preferences: The Role of Affect, Imagery, and Values
Leiserowitz, A. (2006) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 · Cited by 2,197
Effects of Public Opinion on Policy
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1983) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1956018 · Cited by 1,778
The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda
Burstein, P. (2003) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290305600103 · Cited by 1,438
Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies: A test of VBN theory
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.08.003 · Cited by 1,184
Cited by
Making carbon pricing work for citizens
Klenert, D., Mattauch, L., Combet, E., Edenhofer, O., Hepburn, C., Rafaty, R., & Stern, N. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0201-2 · Cited by 793
Fairbrother, M., Johansson Sevä, I., & Kulin, J. (2019) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.102003 · Cited by 268
Cooperation in the Climate Commons
Carattini, S., Levin, S., & Tavoni, A. (2019) · Review of Environmental Economics and Policy · doi:10.1093/reep/rez009 · Cited by 134
Fian, L., Felt, U., Hofmann, T., White, M. P., & Pahl, S. (2025) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102583 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M.
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-06-29
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 855-876
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W2209759034
- Cited by
- 965
- References
- 117
- FWCI
- 55.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
- The paper
- Drews, S., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2016). What explains public support for climate policies? A review of empirical and experimental studies. Climate Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1058240
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.