Perspectives of double skin façades for naturally ventilated buildings: A review
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some design parameters such as solar orientation and prevailing wind direction will be much less sensitive to climate change.
“Yet, some design parameters such as solar orientation [156] and prevailing wind direction [156,157], will be much less sensitive to climate change.”
From Resilient cooling strategies – A critical review and qualitative assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [156]
Cites
Adaptive Thermal Comfort: Principles and Practice
Nicol, F., Humphreys, M., & Roaf, S. (2012) · doi:10.4324/9780203123010 · Cited by 636 · see citing works
Is day natural ventilation still possible in office buildings with a double-skin façade?
Gratia, E., & De Herde, A. (2004) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2003.10.006 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Resilient cooling strategies – A critical review and qualitative assessment
Zhang, C., Kazanci, O. B., Levinson, R., Heiselberg, P., Olesen, B. W., Chiesa, G., Sodagar, B., Ai, Z., Selkowitz, S., Zinzi, M., et al. (2021) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111312 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
- Authors
- Barbosa, S., & Ip, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Brighton (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Barbosa, Sabrina
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-12
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 1019-1029
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991243298
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 14.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Brazilian Government Science
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Solar Energy Systems and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Wind and Air Flow Studies
- Keywords
- double-skin facade, naturally ventilated buildings, thermal performance, building energy performance, indoor thermal comfort, building design parameters, design guidelines
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
