Cited by 927Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation

Sun, Qie, Li, Hailong, Yan, Jinying, Liu, Longcheng, Yu, Zhixin, Yu, Xinhai·2015·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Ali, 2010, Selection of appropriate technology for solid waste management: a case of Thammasat hospital, Thailand, World Acad Sci Eng Technol, 40, 251
  2. Gupta M, Coyle I, Thambimuthu K. CO2 capture technologies and oppotunities in Canada. In: Proceedings of the first Canadian CC&S technology roadmap workshop. Calgary, Canada. September 18–19; 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–927 of 927

Metadata

Authors
Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z., & Yu, X.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • Mälardalen University (SE)
  • Vattenfall (Sweden) (SE)
  • KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
  • University of Stavanger (NO)
  • East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Qie
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-11
Volume
51
Pages
521-532
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1868599745
Cited by
924
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 66 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 2
FWCI
81.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2014EEM025)
  • 973 Program (2013CB228305)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords
biogas upgrading, methane recovery, capital and operating costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review