Cited by 927Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionRenewable energy and sustainable power systemsThermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation

Sun, Qie, Li, Hailong, Yan, Jinying, Liu, Longcheng, Yu, Zhixin, Yu, Xinhai·2015·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

DOI 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies
Leung, D. Y. C., Caramanna, G., & Maroto-Valer, M. M. (2014) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 · Cited by 3,198
Biogas production: current state and perspectives
Weiland, P. (2009) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7 · Cited by 2,824
Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion
Mao, C., Feng, Y., Wang, X., & Ren, G. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.032 · Cited by 1,766
The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization
Holm‐Nielsen, J. B., Seadi, T. A., & Oleśkowicz-Popiel, P. (2009) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046 · Cited by 1,620
Techniques for transformation of biogas to biomethane
Ryckebosch, E., Drouillon, M., & Vervaeren, H. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.02.033 · Cited by 1,429
Biomass upgrading by torrefaction for the production of biofuels: A review
van der Stelt, M. J. C., Gerhauser, H., Kiel, J. H. A., & Ptasinski, K. J. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.023 · Cited by 1,262
Bio-oil production and upgrading research: A review
Xiu, S., & Shahbazi, A. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.028 · Cited by 1,127
A review of biogas purification processes
Abatzoglou, N., & Boivin, S. (2008) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.117 · Cited by 715
Membrane-based technologies for biogas separations
Basu, S., Khan, A. L., Cano-Òdena, À., Liu, C., & Vankelecom, I. F. J. (2009) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/b817050a · Cited by 581
Handbook of Clean Energy Systems
See, L., Kraxner, F., Fuss, S., Perger, C., Schill, C., Aoki, K., Leduc, S., McCallum, I., Forsell, N., & Fritz, S. (2014) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118991978 · Cited by 571

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

Ali, 2010, Selection of appropriate technology for solid waste management: a case of Thammasat hospital, Thailand, World Acad Sci Eng Technol, 40, 251
Gupta M, Coyle I, Thambimuthu K. CO2 capture technologies and oppotunities in Canada. In: Proceedings of the first Canadian CC&S technology roadmap workshop. Calgary, Canada. September 18–19; 2003.

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 927

Simultaneous biogas upgrading and biochemicals production using anaerobic bacterial mixed cultures
Omar, B. M., Abou-Shanab, R. A. I., El-Gammal, M. I., Fotidis, I. A., Kougias, P., Zhang, Y., & Angelidaki, İ. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2018.05.049 · Cited by 87
Impurities in biogas: Analytical strategies, occurrence, effects and removal technologies
Bragança, I., Sánchez-Soberón, F., Pantuzza, G. F., Alves, A., & Ratola, N. (2020) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105878 · Cited by 86
Production routes of advanced renewable C1 to C4 alcohols as biofuel components – a review
Schubert, T. (2020) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.2109 · Cited by 86
Hydrogen-Fueled Microbial Pathways in Biogas Upgrading Systems Revealed by Genome-Centric Metagenomics
Treu, L., Campanaro, S., Kougias, P., Sartori, C., Bassani, I., & Angelidaki, İ. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.01079 · Cited by 86
Techno-economic analysis and performance comparison of aqueous deep eutectic solvent and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading
Ma, C., Liu, C., Lü, X., & Ji, X. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.112 · Cited by 82
Techno-economic and environmental process evaluation of biogas upgrading via amine scrubbing
Cavaignac, R. S., Ferreira, N. L., & Guardani, R. (2021) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.097 · Cited by 83
Biogas to Liquefied Biomethane: Assessment of 3P’s–Production, Processing, and Prospects
Qyyum, M. A., Haider, J., Qadeer, K., Valentina, V., Khan, A., Yasin, M., Aslam, M., De Guido, G., Pellegrini, L. A., & Lee, M. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109561 · Cited by 82
Challenges, Opportunities and Future Directions of Membrane Technology for Natural Gas Purification: A Critical Review
Imtiaz, A., Othman, M. H. D., Jilani, A., Khan, I. U., Kamaludin, R., Iqbal, J., & Al-Sehemi, A. G. (2022) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes12070646 · Cited by 82
Upgrading biogas by a low-temperature CO2 removal technique
Yousef, A. M. I., Eldrainy, Y. A., El-Maghlany, W. M., & Attia, A. E. (2016) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2016.03.026 · Cited by 82
Biomethane production potential of slaughterhouse waste in the United States
Wang, S., Jena, U., & Das, K. C. (2018) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.07.059 · Cited by 81
Exergy and energy analysis of biogas upgrading by pressure swing adsorption: Dynamic analysis of the process
Vilardi, G., Bassano, C., Deiana, P., & Verdone, N. (2020) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113482 · Cited by 81
Water Resistant and Flexible MOF Materials for Highly Efficient Separation of Methane from Nitrogen
Liu, X., Gu, Y., Sun, T., Guo, Y., Wei, X., Zhao, S., & Wang, S. (2019) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.9b03566 · Cited by 79
Economic assessment of biogas purification systems for removal of both H2S and siloxane from biogas
Zhang, Y., Kawasaki, Y., Oshita, K., Takaoka, M., Minami, D., Inoue, G., & Tanaka, T. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.058 · Cited by 80
Syngas production by means of biogas catalytic partial oxidation and dry reforming using Rh-based catalysts
Moral, A., Reyero, I., Alfaro-Isac, C., Bimbela, F., & Gandía, L. M. (2017) · Catalysis Today · doi:10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.049 · Cited by 80
Bioelectrochemical system for the enhancement of methane production by anaerobic digestion of alkaline pretreated sludge
Xu, X., Wang, W., Chen, C., Xie, P., Liu, W., Zhou, X., Wang, X., Yuan, Y., Wang, A., Lee, D., et al. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123000 · Cited by 79
Enhancing and upgrading biogas and biomethane production in anaerobic digestion: a comprehensive review
Aworanti, O. A., Ajani, A. O., Agbede, O. O., Agarry, S. E., Ogunkunle, O., Laseinde, O. T., Kalam, M. A., & Fattah, I. M. R. (2023) · Frontiers in Energy Research · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2023.1170133 · Cited by 79
Design of Efficient, Hierarchical Porous Polymers Endowed with Tunable Structural Base Sites for Direct Catalytic Elimination of COS and H2S
Mi, J., Liu, F., Chen, W., Chen, X., Shen, L., Cao, Y., Au, C., Huang, K., Zheng, A., & Jiang, L. (2019) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.9b09149 · Cited by 77
Techno-Economic Assessment of CHP Systems in Wastewater Treatment Plants
Riley, D., Tian, J., Güngör‐Demirci, G., Phelan, P. E., Villalobos, J. R., & Milcarek, R. J. (2020) · Environments · doi:10.3390/environments7100074 · Cited by 77
Economic and environmental life cycle assessment of organic waste treatment by means of incineration and biogasification. Is source segregation of biowaste justified in Germany?
Mayer, F., Bhandari, R., Gäth, S. A., Himanshu, H., & Stobernack, N. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137731 · Cited by 86
Microalgae derived biomass and bioenergy production enhancement through biogas purification and wastewater treatment
Miyawaki, B., Mariano, A. B., VARGAS, J. V. C., Balmant, W., Defrancheschi, A. C., Corrêa, D. D. O., Santos, B., Selesu, N. F. H., Ordóñez, J. C., & Kava, V. M. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.045 · Cited by 78
Renewable CO2 absorbent for carbon capture and biogas upgrading by membrane contactor
He, Q., Yu, G., Yan, S., Dumée, L. F., Zhang, Y., Strezov, V., & Zhao, S. (2017) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2017.11.043 · Cited by 75
Design of biogas upgrading processes based on ionic liquids
Moya, C., Santiago, R., Lemus, J., & Palomar, J. F. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.132103 · Cited by 75
The use of neural modelling to estimate the methane production from slurry fermentation processes
Dach, J., Koszela, K., Boniecki, P., Zaborowicz, M., Lewicki, A., Czekała, W., Skwarcz, J., Qiao, W., Piekarska-Boniecka, H., & Białobrzewski, I. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.093 · Cited by 74
Review of the potential for recycling CO2 from organic waste composting into plant production under controlled environment agriculture
Thomson, A., Price, G. W., Arnold, P., Dixon, M., & Graham, T. J. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130051 · Cited by 73
Advancing anaerobic digestion of sugarcane vinasse: Current development, struggles and future trends on production and end-uses of biogas in Brazil
Júnior, A. D. N. F., Etchebehere, C., Perecin, D., Coelho, S. T., & Woods, J. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.112045 · Cited by 73
Anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with incineration bottom ash: Enhanced methane production and CO2 sequestration
Yin, C., Shen, Y., Zhu, N., Huang, Q., Lou, Z., & Yuan, H. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.02.056 · Cited by 73
Biogas dry reforming for syngas production on La promoted hydrotalcite-derived Ni catalysts
Kalai, D. Y., Stangeland, K., Jin, Y., Tucho, W. M., & Yu, Z. (2018) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.08.181 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Food Waste Valorization Based on Anaerobic Digestion
Lytras, G., Lytras, C., Mathioudakis, D., Παπαδοπούλου, Κ., & Lyberatos, G. (2020) · Waste and Biomass Valorization · doi:10.1007/s12649-020-01108-z · Cited by 75
Biomethane Production Via Anaerobic Digestion and Biomass Gasification
Li, H., Mehmood, D., Thorin, E., & Yu, Z. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.490 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Venturi-type injection system as a potential H2 mass transfer technology for full-scale in situ biomethanation
Jensen, M. B., Kofoed, M. V. W., Fischer, K., Voigt, N. V., Agneessens, L. M., Batstone, D. J., & Ottosen, L. D. M. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.04.034 · Cited by 72
Impacts of the surfactant sulfonated lignin on hydrate based CO2 capture from a CO2/CH4 gas mixture
Yi, J., Zhong, D., Yan, J., & Lu, Y. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.01.007 · Cited by 72
Self-citation
Comparative analysis of urban ecological management models incorporating low-carbon transformation
Wang, C., Zhan, J., & Xin, Z. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120190 · Cited by 76
Experimental and feasibility assessment of biogas production by anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable waste from Joburg Market
Masebinu, S. O., Akinlabi, E. T., Muzenda, E., Aboyade, A. O., & Mbohwa, C. (2018) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.02.011 · Cited by 71
High-efficiency separation of CO2 from CO2-CH4 gas mixtures via gas hydrates under static conditions
Cheng, Z., Liu, W., Li, S., Wang, S., Liu, Y., Sun, X., Chen, C., Jiang, L., & Song, Y. (2022) · Separation and Purification Technology · doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121297 · Cited by 70
Capturing CO2 from Biogas Plants
Li, H., Tan, Y., Ditaranto, M., Yan, J., & Yu, Z. (2017) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1738 · Cited by 70
Self-citation
Biogas upgrading to methane: Application of a regenerable polyethyleneimine-impregnated polymeric resin (NKA-9) via CO2 sorption
Meng, Y., Jiang, J., Gao, Y., Aihemaiti, A., Ju, T., Xu, Y., & Liu, N. (2018) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.12.091 · Cited by 70
Environmental-Economic Assessment of the Pressure Swing Adsorption Biogas Upgrading Technology
Kohlheb, N., Wluka, M., Bezama, A., Thrän, D., Aurich, A., & Müller, R. (2020) · BioEnergy Research · doi:10.1007/s12155-020-10205-9 · Cited by 70
Biogas upgrading by adsorption processes: Mathematical modeling, simulation and optimization approach – A review
Hosseini, S. S., & Denayer, J. F. M. (2022) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2022.107483 · Cited by 68
Carbon dioxide removal from biogas through pressure swing adsorption – A review
Bahrun, M. H. V., Bono, A., Othman, N., & Zaini, M. A. A. (2022) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2022.05.012 · Cited by 74
Integrating electrochemical, biological, physical, and thermochemical process units to expand the applicability of anaerobic digestion
Angenent, L. T., Usack, J. G., Xu, J., Hafenbradl, D., Posmanik, R., & Tester, J. W. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.104 · Cited by 69
From renewable energy to sustainable protein sources: Advancement, challenges, and future roadmaps
Khoshnevisan, B., He, L. F., Xu, M., Valverde‐Pérez, B., Sillman, J., Mitraka, G.-C., Kougias, P., Zhang, Y., Yan, S., Ji, L., et al. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2021.112041 · Cited by 74
Investigating the potential of heavy metal accumulation from hemp. The use of industrial hemp (Cannabis Sativa L.) for phytoremediation of heavily and moderated polluted soils
Golia, E. E., Bethanis, J., Ntinopoulos, N., Kaffe, G.-G., Komnou, A. A., & Vasilou, C. (2022) · Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.scp.2022.100961 · Cited by 71
Spatial analysis of feedstock supply and logistics to establish regional biogas power generation: A case study in the region of Sicily
Valenti, F., Porto, S. M. C., Dale, B. E., & Liao, W. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.022 · Cited by 68
Screening of microalgae for integral biogas slurry nutrient removal and biogas upgrading by different microalgae cultivation technology
Wang, X., Bao, K., Cao, W., Zhao, Y., & Hu, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05841-9 · Cited by 67
Cryogenic vs. absorption biogas upgrading in liquefied biomethane production – An energy efficiency analysis
Hashemi, S. E., Sarker, S., Lien, K. M., Schnell, S. K., & Austbø, B. (2019) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2019.01.172 · Cited by 67
Potential of Livestock Generated Biomass: Untapped Energy Source in India
Kaur, G., Brar, Y. S., & Kothari, D. P. (2017) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en10070847 · Cited by 66
Insights into the Electron Transfer Behaviors of a Biocathode Regulated by Cathode Potentials in Microbial Electrosynthesis Cells for Biogas Upgrading
Tian, Y. E., Wu, J., Liang, D., Li, J., Liu, G., Lin, N., Li, D., & Feng, Y. (2023) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.2c09871 · Cited by 66
Bio-integrated carbon capture and utilization: at the interface between capture chemistry and archaeal CO2 reduction
Sieborg, M. U., Nielsen, A. K. H., Ottosen, L. D. M., Daasbjerg, K., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51700-3 · Cited by 71
Evaluation of sustainable scrubbing agents for ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestate
Jamaludin, Z., Rollings-Scattergood, S., Lutes, K., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.007 · Cited by 66
Current understanding and perspectives in anaerobic digestion based on genome-resolved metagenomic approaches
Kim, N. K., Lee, S., Kim, Y., & Park, H. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126350 · Cited by 65
Biogas production and its utilization in internal combustion engines - A review
Vasan, V., Sridharan, N. V., Feroskhan, M. M., Vaithiyanathan, S., Subramanian, B., Tsai, P., Lin, Y., Lay, C., Wang, C., & Ponnusamy, V. K. (2024) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.04.014 · Cited by 70
Assessment of zeolite 13X and Lewatit® VP OC 1065 for application in a continuous temperature swing adsorption process for biogas upgrading
Sonnleitner, E., Schöny, G., & Hofbauer, H. (2017) · Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery · doi:10.1007/s13399-017-0293-3 · Cited by 69
Forecasting Turkey's cattle and sheep manure based biomethane potentials till 2026
Melikoğlu, M., & Menekse, Z. K. (2019) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105440 · Cited by 64
Technology roadmap of renewable natural gas: Identifying trends for research and development to improve biogas upgrading technology management
Assunção, L. R. C., Mendes, P. A. S., Matos, S. V., & Borschiver, S. (2021) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116849 · Cited by 67
Green pathways for urea synthesis: A review from Australia's perspective
Milani, D., Kiani, A., Haque, N., Giddey, S., & Feron, P. H. M. (2022) · Sustainable Chemistry for Climate Action · doi:10.1016/j.scca.2022.100008 · Cited by 63
A review on solar energy intensified biomass valorization and value-added products production: Practicability, challenges, techno economic and lifecycle assessment
Naveen, S., Aravind, S., Yamini, B., Vasudhareni, R., Gopinath, K. P., Arun, J., & Pugazhendhi, A. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137028 · Cited by 63
Separation of CO2 and CH4 from Biogas by Formation of Clathrate Hydrates: Importance of the Driving Force and Kinetic Promoters
Profio, P. D., Canale, V., d’Alessandro, N., Germani, R., Crescenzo, A. D., & Fontana, A. (2016) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b02832 · Cited by 62
Biogas to H2 conversion with CO2 capture using chemical looping technology: Process simulation and comparison to conventional reforming processes
Kong, F., Swift, J., Zhang, Q., Fan, L., & Tong, A. (2020) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118479 · Cited by 62
Zeolite membrane process for industrial CO2/CH4 separation
Nobandegani, M. S., Yu, L., & Hedlund, J. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.137223 · Cited by 63
Effects of influent C/N ratios and treatment technologies on integral biogas upgrading and pollutants removal from synthetic domestic sewage
Xu, J. C., Wang, X., Sun, S., Zhao, Y., & Hu, C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11207-y · Cited by 62
Biogas Upgrading Approaches with Special Focus on Siloxane Removal—A Review
Nyamukamba, P., Mukumba, P., Chikukwa, E. S., & Makaka, G. (2020) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en13226088 · Cited by 60
Microbial electrochemical approaches of carbon dioxide utilization for biogas upgrading
Aryal, N., Zhang, Y., Bajracharya, S., Pant, D., & Chen, X. (2021) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132843 · Cited by 60
Recent advances of biogas reforming for hydrogen production: Methods, purification, utility and techno-economics analysis
Kumar, R., & Kumar, A. (2024) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2024.02.143 · Cited by 60
Experimental study on hydrate-based CO2 removal from CH4/CO2 mixture
Wang, F., Fu, S., Guo, G., Jia, Z., Luo, S., & Guo, R. (2016) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.107 · Cited by 60
A review on biogas purification through hydrogen sulphide removal
Andriani, D., Rajani, A., Kusnadi, K., Santosa, A., Saepudin, A., Wresta, A., & Atmaja, T. D. (2020) · IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · doi:10.1088/1755-1315/483/1/012034 · Cited by 59
Modeling, simulation and evaluation of biogas upgrading using aqueous choline chloride/urea
Ma, C., Xie, Y., Ji, X., Liu, C., & Lü, X. (2017) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.059 · Cited by 60
Improving high-pressure water scrubbing through process integration and solvent selection for biogas upgrading
Wang, H., Ma, C., Yang, Z., Lü, X., & Ji, X. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115462 · Cited by 59
Cost and Life-Cycle Greenhouse Gas Implications of Integrating Biogas Upgrading and Carbon Capture Technologies in Cellulosic Biorefineries
Yang, M., Baral, N. R., Anastasopoulou, A., Breunig, H. M., & Scown, C. D. (2020) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c02816 · Cited by 61
Techno-economic and sensitivity analysis of biomethane production via landfill biogas upgrading and power-to-gas technology
Ghafoori, M. S., Loubar, K., Mylène, M. G., & Tazerout, M. L. (2021) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2021.122086 · Cited by 59
Biogas upgrading and biochemical production from gas fermentation: Impact of microbial community and gas composition
Omar, B. M., El-Gammal, M. I., Abou-Shanab, R. A. I., Fotidis, I. A., Angelidaki, İ., & Zhang, Y. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121413 · Cited by 57
Enhancement of Bioelectrochemical CO2 Reduction with a Carbon Brush Electrode via Direct Electron Transfer
Liu, C., Yuan, X., Gu, Y., Chen, H., Sun, D., Li, P., Li, M., Dang, Y., Smith, J. A., & Holmes, D. E. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03623 · Cited by 59
Nanoparticle Exsolution from Nanoporous Perovskites for Highly Active and Stable Catalysts
Rudolph, B., Tsiotsias, A. I., Ehrhardt, B., Dolcet, P., Gross, S., Haas, S., Charisou, N. D., Goula, M. A., & Mascotto, S. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202205890 · Cited by 56
Amino-functionalized POSS nanocage intercalated graphene oxide membranes for efficient biogas upgrading
Yang, L., Liu, X., Wu, H., Wang, S., Liang, X., Ma, L., Ren, Y., Wu, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, M., et al. (2019) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117733 · Cited by 54
Tailored CO 2 -Philic Anionic Poly(ionic liquid) Composite Membranes: Synthesis, Characterization, and Gas Transport Properties
Kammakakam, I., Bara, J. E., Jackson, E. M., Lertxundi, J., Mecerreyes, D., & Tomé, L. C. (2020) · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00327 · Cited by 58
A review on the removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas by adsorption using sorbents derived from waste
Ahmad, W., Sethupathi, S., Kanadasan, G., Lee, C.-L., & Kanthasamy, R. (2019) · Reviews in chemical engineering · doi:10.1515/revce-2018-0048 · Cited by 50
Performance evaluation of biogas upgrading by pressurized water scrubbing via modelling and simulation
Wylock, C. E., & Budzianowski, W. M. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2017.01.012 · Cited by 55
Recent Advances of Biogas Production and Future Perspective
Korbag, I., Omer, S. M. S., Boghazala, H., & Abusasiyah, M. A. A. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.93231 · Cited by 56
A review of membrane material for biogas and natural gas upgrading
Roozitalab, A., Hamidavi, F., & Kargari, A. (2023) · Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jgsce.2023.204969 · Cited by 54
Requirements, techniques, and costs for contaminant removal from landfill gas
Kuhn, J. N., Elwell, A. C., Elsayed, N. H., & Joseph, B. (2017) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2017.02.001 · Cited by 54
Metal–organic frameworks for biogas upgrading: Recent advancements, challenges, and future recommendations
Khan, A., Qyyum, M. A., Saulat, H., Ahmad, R., Peng, X., & Lee, M. (2020) · Applied Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100925 · Cited by 54
Recovering nutrients and unblocking the cake layer of an electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor
Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Chen, Z., Hu, C., & Qu, J. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-53341-y · Cited by 53
Electrochemical sulfide removal by low-cost electrode materials in anaerobic digestion
Lin, H., Williams, N., King, A., & Hu, B. (2016) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2016.03.086 · Cited by 53
Microbial Electrolytic Capture, Separation and Regeneration of CO 2 for Biogas Upgrading
Jin, X., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Zhao, N., & Angelidaki, İ. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b01574 · Cited by 54
Effect of variation in the C/[N+P] ratio on anaerobic digestion
Gil, A., Siles, J. Á., Serrano, A., Chica, A. F., & Martı́n, M. A. (2018) · Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1002/ep.12922 · Cited by 53
Theoretical evaluation and optimization of a cryogenic technology for carbon dioxide separation and methane liquefaction from biogas
Spitoni, M., Pierantozzi, M., Comodi, G., Polonara, F., & Arteconi, A. (2018) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2018.12.007 · Cited by 53
CO2 removal from synthesized ternary gas mixtures used hydrate formation with sodium dodecyl sulfate(SDS) as additive
Zang, X., Wan, L., He, Y. T., & Liang, D. (2019) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2019.116399 · Cited by 53
Hydrogenotrophs-Based Biological Biogas Upgrading Technologies
Tatsiana, A., Lee, I., Joo, S., & Kim, H. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.833482 · Cited by 54
Life cycle assessment of alternative biogas utilisations, including carbon capture and storage or utilisation
Varling, A. S., Christensen, T. H., & Bisinella, V. (2022) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2022.12.005 · Cited by 52
A Scoping Review of Options for Increasing Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge: Challenges and Opportunities for Enhancing Energy Self-Sufficiency in Wastewater Treatment Plants
Lima, D., Appleby, G., & Li, L. (2023) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en16052369 · Cited by 52
An overview of biogas upgrading via pressure swing adsorption: Navigating through bibliometric insights towards a conceptual framework and future research pathways
Ali, A., Othman, M. R., Helwani, Z., & Kim, J. (2024) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118268 · Cited by 55
Techno-economic assessment of a microbial power-to-gas plant – Case study in Belgium
Dael, M. V., Kreps, S., Virag, A., Kessels, K., Remans, K., Thomas, D., & Wilde, F. D. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.01.092 · Cited by 52
Efficient isopropanol biosynthesis by engineered Escherichia coli using biologically produced acetate from syngas fermentation
Yang, H., Zhang, C., Lai, N., Huang, B., Fei, P., Ding, D., Hu, P., Gu, Y., & Wu, H. C. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122337 · Cited by 52
On-site CO2 bio-sequestration in anaerobic digestion: Current status and prospects
Xu, S., Qiao, Z., Luo, L., Sun, Y., Wong, J. W. C., Geng, X., & Ni, J. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125037 · Cited by 51
Biogas upgrading process via low-temperature CO 2 liquefaction and separation
Yousef, A. M., Eldrainy, Y. A., El-Maghlany, W. M., & Attia, A. E. (2017) · Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.001 · Cited by 51
In-situ biogas upgrading process: Modeling and simulations aspects
Lovato, G., Alvarado-Morales, M., Kovalovszki, A., Peprah, M., Kougias, P., Rodrigues, J. A. D., & Angelidaki, İ. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.181 · Cited by 51
Sewage sludge and fat rich materials co-digestion - Performance and energy potential
Grosser, A., & Neczaj, E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.124 · Cited by 51
Next-generation feedstocks methanol and ethylene glycol and their potential in industrial biotechnology
Wagner, N., Wen, L., Frazão, C. J. R., & Walther, T. (2023) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108276 · Cited by 47
Efficient biogas upgrading by a novel membrane-cryogenic hybrid process: Experiment and simulation study
Song, C., Fan, Z., Li, R., Liu, Q., & Kitamura, Y. (2018) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2018.08.027 · Cited by 50
Biohythane production of post-hydrothermal liquefaction wastewater: A comparison of two-stage fermentation and catalytic hydrothermal gasification
Si, B., Watson, J., Aierzhati, A., Yang, L., Liu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.095 · Cited by 50
Biogas Purification and Upgrading Technologies
Rodero, M. D. R., Ángeles, R., Marín, D., Díaz, I., Colzi, A., Posadas, E., Lebrero, R., & Muñoz, R. (2018) · Biofuel and biorefinery technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-77335-3_10 · Cited by 49

Authors: Sun, Q., Li, H., Yan, J., Liu, L., Yu, Z., & Yu, X.
Affiliations: Shandong University (CN)
Mälardalen University (SE)
Vattenfall (Sweden) (SE)
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
University of Stavanger (NO)
East China University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author: Sun, Qie
ORCID: Sun, Qie
Li, Hailong
Yan, Jinying
Liu, Longcheng
Yu, Zhixin
Yu, Xinhai
Venue: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2015-11
Volume: 51
Pages: 521-532
ISSN: 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.029
OpenAlex: W1868599745
Cited by: 924
References: 53
Citations by year: 2026: 66 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 115 · 2019: 87 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 72 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 2
FWCI: 81.20
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations: Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders: Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China (ZR2014EEM025)
973 Program (2013CB228305)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Keywords: biogas upgrading, methane recovery, capital and operating costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Selection of appropriate biogas upgrading technology-a review of biogas cleaning, upgrading and utilisation

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks