Cited by 400Multi-Criteria Decision MakingEnergy and Environmental SustainabilityCapital Investment and Risk Analysis

Decision making in renewable energy investments: a review

Strantzali, Eleni, Aravossis, Konstantinos·2016·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.021

Cites

203 of 203 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strantzali, E., & Aravossis, K.
Affiliations
National Technical University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Strantzali, Eleni
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
55
Pages
885-898
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2183271101
Cited by
400
References
203
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 13
FWCI
30.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Energy and Environmental Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Capital Investment and Risk Analysis
Keywords
renewable energy investment, decision support methodology, energy planning, sustainability assessment, multi-criteria decision making, economic and environmental impact, social impact

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review