Cited by 196Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMunicipal Solid Waste ManagementBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review of global strategies promoting the conversion of food waste to bioenergy via anaerobic digestion

De Clercq, Djavan, Wen, Zongguo, Gottfried, Oliver, Schmidt, Franziska, Fei, Fan·2017·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.047

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Bates, 2015, Biomethane for transport from landfill and anaerobic digestion, RICARDO-AEA, 1
  2. Gelsenwasser, 2010, Cooperation project sustainable biogas at the lower Rhine – a decentralised, cooperative and sustainable biogas feed-in system, Energ-Wasser, 56
  3. Li, 2014, Standard chartered equity research: capital environment holdings – time to get excited about this rising waste player, Stand Chart
  4. Liu, 2012, Pilot-scale anaerobic co-digestion of municipal biomass waste: focusing on biogas production and GHG reduction, Renew Energy, 44, 463, 10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.092 · DOI
  5. Morton, 2015, Anaerobic digestion in The UK—2015 update, BioCycle, 56, 43
  6. Nelles M. Technical challenges for biogas production. In: Proceedings of the international symposium biogas goes (Far) East. BiogasWorld, Berlin; 2014. Available from: 〈http://www.biogasworld.de/Downloads/DBFZprogram_english.pdf〉.
  7. Quadros R, Santos GV, Tavares AN, Bajay SV. Brazilian research in municipal solid waste biogas: how large is it and how far has it gone? In: Proceedings of the 30th international conference on solid waste technology and management, Philadelphia, USA; 2015.
  8. SC, State of Connecticut. Chapter 446d: solid waste management. Connecticut General Assembly; 2014.
  9. Zhang, 2017, Combined effect of crude fat content and initial substrate concentration on batch anaerobic digestion characteristics of food waste, Bioresour Technol, 232, 304, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.039 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
De Clercq, D., Wen, Z., Gottfried, O., Schmidt, F., & Fei, F.
Affiliations
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
Corresponding author
Wen, Zongguo
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
79
Pages
204-221
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2616577352
Cited by
191
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research & Development Program of China (2016YFC0502802, 2011BAC06B10)
  • National Natural Science Fund for Outstanding Young Scholars of China (71522011)
  • State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (15L02ESPC)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Municipal Solid Waste Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
food waste, biogas, anaerobic digestion, waste management policy, co-digestion, smart waste management, policy challenges, South Korea, China, France, Germany, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review