The DOI matches its Crossref record; 134 of the 134 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry
Open accessAbstract
Industrial heat is important in Europe’s energy consumption and dominated by fossil fuels. Therefore, promoting renewables in this sector is vital to move Europe towards a low-carbon economy. Since solid biomass is the only renewable with significant industrial use, it is crucial to know the status of its present use and to analyze the prospects of its future utilization by the industry. The current European industrial energy consumption is reviewed, with a focus on bioheat. The available solid biomass feedstock and energy conversion alternatives are examined, along with future perspectives for further biomass consumption in several industrial sectors. Defining global strategies for industrial heat is not easy because of the diversity of industrial processes. Combustion dominates industrial heat production from biomass, but gasification systems are already commercially available. Combined heat and power production is mainly based on steam cycles. The full temperature range required by industry can be attained with biomass efficiently. The use of biomass-fired systems is generalized in the industries that generate solid biomass by-products, but the implementation of additional, more efficient and alternative biomass uses should be sought. Biomass penetration into sectors with no own biomass resources is more difficult. Major barriers are the high investment costs of biomass systems, strong competition with fossil fuels, and feedstock availability and security of supply. Although Europe’s solid biomass production and consumption are almost balanced, the pressure on resources is increasing. Therefore, it is important that resources are monitored and that sustainability is taken into consideration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Synthesis of Transportation Fuels from Biomass: Chemistry, Catalysts, and Engineering
Huber, G. W., Iborra, S., & Corma, A. (2006) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr068360d · Cited by 7,664
Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review
Naik, S. N., Goud, V. V., Rout, P. K., & Dalai, A. K. (2010) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003 · Cited by 3,264
Kan, T., Strezov, V., & Evans, T. J. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185 · Cited by 2,239
Combustion properties of biomass
Jenkins, B. M., Baxter, L. L., Miles, T. R., & Miles, T. R. (1998) · Fuel Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/s0378-3820(97)00059-3 · Cited by 1,938
The Art, Science, and Technology of Charcoal Production
Antal, M. J., & Grønli, M. (2003) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie0207919 · Cited by 1,623
Techno-economic survey of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) systems
Quoilin, S., Broek, M. V. D., Declaye, S., Dewallef, P., & Lemort, V. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.01.028 · Cited by 1,490
Biofuels Production through Biomass Pyrolysis—A Technological Review
Jahirul, M., Rasul, M., Chowdhury, A., & Ashwath, N. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5124952 · Cited by 1,427
The Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Co-firing
(2012) · doi:10.4324/9781849773041 · Cited by 1,423
Low-grade heat conversion into power using organic Rankine cycles – A review of various applications
Tchanche, B. F., Lambrinos, G., Frangoudakis, A., & Papadakis, G. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.024 · Cited by 1,197
A state-of-the-art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and applications
Chen, W.-H., Peng, J., & Bi, X. T. (2015) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039 · Cited by 1,181
Cited by
Biomass for a sustainable bioeconomy: An overview of world biomass production and utilization
Antar, M., Lyu, D., Nazari, M., Shah, A., Zhou, X., & Smith, D. L. (2021) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110691 · Cited by 878
Wang, Z., Burra, K. G., Lei, T., & Gupta, A. K. (2021) · Progress in Energy and Combustion Science · doi:10.1016/j.pecs.2020.100899 · Cited by 634
Islam, N. F., Gogoi, B., Saikia, R., Yousaf, B., Narayan, M., & Sarma, H. (2024) · Regional Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.regsus.2024.100174 · Cited by 119
Angulo-Mosquera, L. S., Alvarado-Alvarado, A. A., Rivas-Arrieta, M. J., Cattaneo, C. R., Rene, E. R., & García-Depraect, O. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148816 · Cited by 103
Metadata
- Authors
- Malico, I., Nepomuceno Pereira, R., Gonçalves, A. C., & Sousa, A. M. O.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-09
- Volume
- 112
- Pages
- 960-977
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2955816834
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 134
- FWCI
- 18.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.022
- The paper
- Malico, I., Nepomuceno Pereira, R., Gonçalves, A. C., & Sousa, A. M. O. (2019). Current status and future perspectives for energy production from solid biomass in the European industry. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.