The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-combustion carbon capture
Open accessAbstract
Abstract CCS, Carbon Capture and Storage, is considered a promising technology to abate CO2 emissions from point sources. The present review deals with the principle of post-combustion capture techniques, including thermal or pressure swing principles, adsorption or absorption, and electrical swing or membrane separation processes. Opportunities and challenges are assessed. In the first section of absorption processes, several commercial technologies are compared and complemented by the aqueous or chilled ammonia (NH3) process, and a dual or strong alkali absorption. The second section deals with adsorption where fixed beds, circulating fluidized beds and counter-current bed configurations will be discussed, with particular focus on the different adsorbents ranging from zeolites or activated carbon, to more complex amine-functionalized adsorbents, nanotubes or metal organic frameworks (MOFs), and alkali-promoted oxides. Thirdly, membrane processes will be analysed. The review will finally summarize challenges and opportunities. Several research groups confirmed that absorption is the most mature post-combustion capture process: among the assessment of post-combustion CCS, 57% apply absorption, 14% rely on adsorption, 8% use membranes, and 21% apply mineralization or bio-fixation. This conclusion was in-line with expectations since absorption gas separation has been largely applied in various petrochemical industries. All other systems need further development prior to large scale application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Post-Combustion CO 2 Capture Using Solid Sorbents: A Review
Samanta, A., Zhao, A., Shimizu, G. K. H., Sarkar, P., & Gupta, R. (2012) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie200686q · Cited by 1,889
CO2 capture and separation technologies for end-of-pipe applications – A review
Olajire, A. A. (2010) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2010.02.030 · Cited by 1,217
Carbon-Based Adsorbents for Postcombustion CO 2 Capture: A Critical Review
Creamer, A. E., & Gao, B. (2016) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.6b00627 · Cited by 598
Perspectives on Microalgal CO2-Emission Mitigation Systems—A Review
Ho, S.-H., Chen, C.-Y., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2011) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.11.001 · Cited by 580
Reducing the Cost of CO 2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566
Cited by
Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Madejski, P., Chmiel, K., Subramanian, N., & Kuś, T. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15030887 · Cited by 485
McLaughlin, H., Littlefield, A. A., Menefee, M., Kinzer, A., Hull, T., Sovacool, B. K., Bazilian, M. D., Kim, J., & Griffiths, S. (2023) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2023.113215 · Cited by 448
Review of solvent based carbon-dioxide capture technologies
Mumford, K. A., Wu, Y., Smith, K. H., & Stevens, G. W. (2015) · Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11705-015-1514-6 · Cited by 311
Hanson, E., Nwakile, C., & Hammed, V. O. (2025) · Results in Surfaces and Interfaces · doi:10.1016/j.rsurfi.2024.100381 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J., & Fan, X.
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 138
- Pages
- 110490
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140602829
- Cited by
- 652
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 26.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-combustion carbon capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490
- The paper
- Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J., & Fan, X. (2021). Post-combustion carbon capture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.