Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 652

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Post-combustion carbon capture

Open access
Chao, Cong, Deng, Yimin, Dewil, Raf, Baeyens, Jan, Fan, Xianfeng·2021·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

Abstract CCS, Carbon Capture and Storage, is considered a promising technology to abate CO2 emissions from point sources. The present review deals with the principle of post-combustion capture techniques, including thermal or pressure swing principles, adsorption or absorption, and electrical swing or membrane separation processes. Opportunities and challenges are assessed. In the first section of absorption processes, several commercial technologies are compared and complemented by the aqueous or chilled ammonia (NH3) process, and a dual or strong alkali absorption. The second section deals with adsorption where fixed beds, circulating fluidized beds and counter-current bed configurations will be discussed, with particular focus on the different adsorbents ranging from zeolites or activated carbon, to more complex amine-functionalized adsorbents, nanotubes or metal organic frameworks (MOFs), and alkali-promoted oxides. Thirdly, membrane processes will be analysed. The review will finally summarize challenges and opportunities. Several research groups confirmed that absorption is the most mature post-combustion capture process: among the assessment of post-combustion CCS, 57% apply absorption, 14% rely on adsorption, 8% use membranes, and 21% apply mineralization or bio-fixation. This conclusion was in-line with expectations since absorption gas separation has been largely applied in various petrochemical industries. All other systems need further development prior to large scale application.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 652

Metadata

Authors
Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J., & Fan, X.
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
138
Pages
110490
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140602829
Cited by
652
References
5
FWCI
26.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-combustion carbon capture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490
The paper
Chao, C., Deng, Y., Dewil, R., Baeyens, J., & Fan, X. (2021). Post-combustion carbon capture. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110490

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.