Electrochemical Technologies for Lithium Recovery from Liquid Resources: A Review
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ED systems require the feed solution to be pretreated so that Ca2+, Mg2+, and other metals that cause membrane fouling can be removed prior to Li+ extraction.
“Similarly to other membrane technologies, ED systems require the feed solution to be pretreated so that Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , and other metals that cause membrane fouling can be removed prior to Li + extraction (Wang et al., 2022).”
From A review of technologies for direct lithium extraction from low Li+ concentration aqueous solutions (2022) · cites this paper as Wang et al., 2022
Traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have complex treatment stages.
“Therefore, traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have significant drawbacks, including high energy consumption, lengthy processing times, complex treatment stages, and potential secondary contamination, thereby driving interest toward more efficient extraction technologies like DLE [42].”
From Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have potential secondary contamination.
“Therefore, traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have significant drawbacks, including high energy consumption, lengthy processing times, complex treatment stages, and potential secondary contamination, thereby driving interest toward more efficient extraction technologies like DLE [42].”
From Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
The drawbacks of traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods drive interest toward more efficient extraction technologies like direct lithium extraction.
“Therefore, traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have significant drawbacks, including high energy consumption, lengthy processing times, complex treatment stages, and potential secondary contamination, thereby driving interest toward more efficient extraction technologies like DLE [42].”
From Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have lengthy processing times.
“Therefore, traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have significant drawbacks, including high energy consumption, lengthy processing times, complex treatment stages, and potential secondary contamination, thereby driving interest toward more efficient extraction technologies like DLE [42].”
From Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have high energy consumption.
“Therefore, traditional solar evaporation and precipitation methods have significant drawbacks, including high energy consumption, lengthy processing times, complex treatment stages, and potential secondary contamination, thereby driving interest toward more efficient extraction technologies like DLE [42].”
From Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
Numerous electrochemical techniques have recently been proposed and have garnered significant interest as an alternative solution for lithium recovery.
“Numerous electrochemical techniques have recently been proposed and have garnered significant interest as an alternative solution for lithium recovery [42,47].”
From Electrochemical Direct Lithium Extraction: A Review of Electrodialysis and Capacitive Deionization Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [42]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 99 · Cited by 211
- Authors
- Wang, J., Yue, X., Wang, P., Yu, T., Du, X., Hao, X., Abudula, A., & Guan, G.
- Affiliations
- Hirosaki University (JP)
- Taiyuan University of Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Guan, Guoqing
- Venue
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-02
- Volume
- 154
- Pages
- 111813
- ISSN
- 1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3208956533
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 49 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
- www.elsevier.com/open-access/userlicense/1.0/ (am, 635 d)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-017 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-037 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-012 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-029 (stm-asf)
- doi.org/10.15223/policy-004 (stm-asf)
- Locations
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19K12395)
- China Scholarship Council
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFE0129200)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Membrane-based Ion Separation Techniques
- Keywords
- lithium recovery, electrochemical lithium extraction, salt lake brine, geothermal brine, spent lithium-ion battery recycling, lithium selectivity, energy consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review