Cited by 36Environmental Impact and SustainabilityExtraction and Separation ProcessesPhotovoltaic Systems and Sustainability

Is lithium from geothermal brines the sustainable solution for Li-ion batteries?

Open access
Schenker, Vanessa, Bayer, Peter, Oberschelp, Christopher, Pfister, Stephan·2024·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Abstract

The rising demand for Li, paramount for energy storage, necessitates expanded supply. As the supply is concentrated in a few countries, this poses supply chain risks for Li-ion battery makers. To diversify suppliers, alternative Li ore deposits such as geothermal brines are being explored. However, Li extraction from geothermal brines is challenging due to the unique chemistry and elevated temperatures. Since Li-extraction from geothermal brines is in its infancy, data availability and quality are still poor, hampering life cycle assessments. Hence, this study provides a parametrized life cycle inventory model of Li carbonate production from geothermal brines. The model accounts for site-specific environmental conditions and technological features. Life cycle impacts at the Salton Sea in the US (1686 cases) and the Upper Rhine Graben in Germany (1982 cases) are quantified. The high case numbers are chosen to mitigate the high uncertainties in input parameters. Specifically, the brine chemistry, adsorption yield, drilling required and energy inputs are varied. Climate change impacts of selected cases vary within 18–59 kg CO2eq/kg Li carbonate at the Salton Sea and within 5.3–46 kg CO2eq/kg Li carbonate at the Upper Rhine Graben, compared to 2.1–11 kg CO2eq/kg Li carbonate in existing ecoinvent data sets. The wide range of potential impacts underscore the necessity of early-stage assessments of the technologies. In case of high drilling demand and use of fossil energy, climate change impacts of Li-ion batteries using Li carbonate from geothermal brines can increase by 30–41 % compared to literature values.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114456

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 30 · Cited by 36

Authors
Schenker, V., Bayer, P., Oberschelp, C., & Pfister, S.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
Corresponding author
Schenker, Vanessa
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
199
Pages
114456
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396499540
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NCCR Catalysis
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich (180544)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Photovoltaic Systems and Sustainability
Keywords
lithium recovery, geothermal brine, lithium carbonate, life cycle inventory, life cycle assessment, lithium supply chain, lithium-ion batteries, climate change impacts, CO2 emissions, adsorption, Salton Sea, Upper Rhine Graben

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review