Cited by 44Effects of Environmental Stressors on LivestockThermal Regulation in MedicineVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Factors affecting rectal temperature measurement using commonly available digital thermometers

Naylor, Jonathan M., Streeter, Renee M., Torgerson, Paul·2012·Research in Veterinary Science

Abstract

Rectal temperature measurement is an essential part of physical examination of cattle and some physiological experiments. Modern digital thermometers are often used to measure rectal temperatures by students; this study describes their reliability and appropriate use. Students measured rectal temperature on 53 occasions using their personal digital thermometer and techniques gained from previous instruction, rectal temperature was also measured by an experienced person using a Cornell mercury thermometer completely inserted in the rectum. Cornell mercury thermometers values were 38.95±0.05°C (mean±1 SE, n=53). Student rectal temperature measurements using their initial technique were nearly 0.5°C lower, 38.46±0.07°C. After receiving instruction to insert the digital thermometer to the window, student obtained values were 38.77±0.06°C; these are significantly higher than with the student's initial technique and closer to those obtained with a Cornell thermometer. In a series of 53 water bath tests, student owned thermometers recorded similar mean values to those of a traceable (reference) digital thermometer, Cornell mercury thermometer readings were 0.2°C higher. 10 individual digital thermometers were repeatedly tested against a traceable thermometer in a water bath, one was inaccurate. In a separate experiment a trained clinician tested the effect of angle of insertion of a digital thermometer on temperature readings and the affect was <0.1°C. We conclude that accurate temp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rvsc.2010.10.027

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Naylor, J. M., Streeter, R. M., & Torgerson, P.
Affiliations
Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine (KN)
Venue
Research in Veterinary Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-02
Volume
92
Issue
1
Pages
121-123
ISSN
0034-5288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053402475
Cited by
44
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Effects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Thermal Regulation in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
rectal temperature measurement, digital thermometer, cattle, thermometer accuracy, insertion technique, mercury thermometer, measurement reliability, veterinary clinical examination
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Temperature, Cattle, Fever, Rectum, Thermometers, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review