Cited by 38Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchVeterinary Medicine and SurgeryComparative Animal Anatomy Studies

Oral health correlates of captivity

Open access
Kapoor, Varsha, Antonelli, Tyler, Parkinson, Jennifer A., Hartstone-Rose, Adam·2016·Research in Veterinary Science

Abstract

The predominant diet fed to captive carnivores in North America consists of ground meat formulated to provide full nutritional requirements. However, this ground meat diet completely lacks the mechanical properties (i.e., toughness and hardness) of the foods these animals would consume in the wild. The goal of this study is to evaluate the effect of captivity on oral health by comparing the prevalence of periodontal disease and dental calculus accumulation in wild and captive lions and tigers (Panthera leo and Panthera tigris), and to also correlate oral health with cranial morphology in these specimens. To achieve this, 34 adult lion and 29 adult tiger skulls were scored for the presence and extent of dental calculus and periodontal disease. These oral health scores were also compared to cranial deformations examined in a previous study. We found that the occurrence and severity of calculus buildup and periodontal disease was significantly higher in captive felids compared to their wild counterparts. Further, higher calculus accumulation occurred on the posterior teeth when compared to the anterior teeth, while an opposite trend for periodontal disease was observed. We also found a significant correlation between oral health and cranial morphology of lions and tigers. The results suggest that food mechanical properties are significant factors contributing to oral health in felids.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rvsc.2016.06.009

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Periodontal disease among captive animals was reversed when their diets were increased in texture to provide masticatory challenge to dentogingival surfaces and alleviate plaque formation.

    “Interestingly, periodontal disease among captive animals was reversed when their diets were increased in texture to provide masticatory challenge to dentogingival surfaces and alleviate plaque formation.”
  • Wild animals have superior oral health status to animals living in captivity because of the absence of masticatory challenge among foods given to domestic and captive animals.

    “Wild animals have an oral health status superior to that of animals living in captivity because of the absence of masticatory challenge among foods given to domestic and captive animals.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kapoor, V., Antonelli, T., Parkinson, J. A., & Hartstone-Rose, A.
Affiliations
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of San Diego (US)
Venue
Research in Veterinary Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
107
Pages
213-219
ISSN
0034-5288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2436603700
Cited by
38
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research in Veterinary Science (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Cleveland Zoological Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
Keywords
captive carnivores, oral health, periodontal disease, dental calculus, lion, tiger, Panthera, skull morphology, food mechanical properties, wild versus captive animals, tooth position
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Zoo, Dental Calculus, Diet, Lions, Oral Health, Periodontal Diseases, Tigers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review