Cited by 81Animal health and immunologyClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlVeterinary Medicine and Surgery

Hematology reference intervals for neonatal Holstein calves

Panousis, Nikolaos, Siachos, Nektarios, Kitkas, Georgios, Kalaitzakis, Emmanouil, Kritsepi-Konstantinou, Maria, Valergakis, Georgios E.·2018·Research in Veterinary Science

Abstract

Data regarding hematologic reference intervals (RI) for neonatal calves have not been published yet. The aims of this study were: a) to establish hematology RIs for neonatal Holstein calves, b) to compare them with the RIs for lactating cows, and c) to investigate the relationship of age and gender with the hematologic profile of calves. Two-hundred and fifty-four clinically healthy Holstein calves (1-9days old, from 30 farms) and 82 healthy Holstein cows (between 30 and 150days in milk, from 10 farms) were blood sampled once for a complete blood count evaluation, using the ADVIA 120 hematology analyzer. An additional blood sample was collected from each calf for serum total protein concentration measurement. RIs and age-related RIs were calculated with the Reference Value Advisor freeware. Comparisons between calves and cows and between male and female calves were performed with t-test or Mann-Whitney test. Red blood cell count (RBC), white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte and platelet counts in calves were higher, while mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were lower than in cows. Lymphocyte and platelets showed a notable increase through age. Finally, female calves had higher RBC, hematocrit and hemoglobin concentration than males. Age-specific RIs should be used for the interpretation of the complete blood count in Holstein calves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rvsc.2018.01.002

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panousis, N., Siachos, N., Kitkas, G., Kalaitzakis, E., Kritsepi-Konstantinou, M., & Valergakis, G. E.
Affiliations
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Corresponding author
Panousis, Nikolaos
Venue
Research in Veterinary Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
118
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0034-5288 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2784112349
Cited by
81
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
11.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2019-04-01)
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Veterinary Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
Keywords
neonatal calves, Holstein cows, complete blood count, age-related reference values, sex differences, lactating dairy cows, serum total protein, red blood cell count, white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, platelet count, hematocrit, hemoglobin levels, mean corpuscular volume
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Blood Cell Count, Cattle, Erythrocyte Count, Female, Hematologic Tests, Hematology, Lactation, Male, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review