Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 355

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery

Open access
Efeoğlu, B., Ekmekçi, Y., Çiçek, N.·2009·South African Journal of Botany

Abstract

Water shortages and soil water losses due to environmental change and land use change are challenges to maize production. An experiment was conducted to investigate the physiological responses of the maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars Doge, Vero and Luce to drought conditions. Drought stress was imposed on the plants 12 days after sowing by withholding irrigation for 12 days and then rewatering for 6 days. Growth of all cultivars was retarded under drought stress conditions and regained speed during the recovery stage. RWC decreased in all cultivars by drought and reached the control values during the recovery period. Fresh and dry biomass of the cultivars significantly decreased in all cultivars. Drought affected the minimum fluorescence (Fo) of all cultivars, but a significant effect was only found in Doge. Drought also caused decreases in FM, FV/FM, FV′/FM′, ϕPSII and qL; and an increase of non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), but those returned to control values during the recovery stage in all three cultivars. Chlorophyll (chl) a, chl b, total chl (a + b) and carotenoid contents of all maize cultivars were significantly reduced under drought, but a recovery was observed following rewatering. Anthocyanin and proline contents increased in all cultivars. Although Doge was affected from drought more than the other cultivars, it could probably withstand drought with better upregulating its protective mechanisms. As a result of that Doge was classified as less drought tolerant, but others as tolerant.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sajb.2008.06.005

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Decov, 2000, Effects of water stress and high-temperature stress on the structure and activity of photosynthetic apparatus of Zea mays and Helianthus annuus, Photosynthetica, 38, 361, 10.1023/A:1010961218145 · doi:10.1023/a:1010961218145
  2. Ekmekçi, 2005, Photochemical and antioxidant responses in the leaves of Xerophyta viscosa Baker and Digitaria sanguinalis L. under water deficit, Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 60C, 435, 10.1515/znc-2005-5-612 · doi:10.1515/znc-2005-5-612
  3. Jung, 2000, Antioxidant responses of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) to photoinhibition and oxidative stress induced by norflurazon under high and low PPFDs, Plant Science, 153, 145, 10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00259-9 · doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(99)00259-9
  4. Kocheva, 2004, Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence and membrane injury in the leaves of barley cultivars under osmotic stress, Bioelectrochemistry, 63, 121, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.09.020 · doi:10.1016/j.bioelechem.2003.09.020
  5. Li, 1998, Effects of plant growth regulators on drought resistance of two maize cultivars, South African Journal of Botany, 64, 116, 10.1016/S0254-6299(15)30844-9 · doi:10.1016/s0254-6299(15)30844-9
  6. Li, 2006, Evaluation of chlorophyll content and fluorescence parameters as indicators of drought tolerance in barley, Agriculture in Sciences in China, 5, 751, 10.1016/S1671-2927(06)60120-X · doi:10.1016/s1671-2927(06)60120-x
  7. Mancinelli, 1975, Photocontrol of anthocyanin synthesis. III. The action of streptomycin on the synthesis of chlorophyll and anthocyanin, Plant Physiology, 55, 251, 10.1104/pp.55.2.251 · doi:10.1104/pp.55.2.251
  8. Mohsenzadeh, 2006, Physiological and molecular responses of Aeluropus lagopoides (Poaceae) to water deficit, Environmental and Experimental Botany, 56, 314, 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.03.008 · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.03.008
  9. Mullineaux, 2005, State transitions: an example of acclimation to low-light stress, Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 389, 10.1093/jxb/eri064 · doi:10.1093/jxb/eri064
  10. Riccardi, 2004, Deciphering genetic variations of proteome responses to water deficit in maize leaves, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 42, 1003, 10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.09.009 · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2004.09.009
  11. Selmani, 2003, Daytime chlorophyll fluorescence measurement in field-grown maize and its genetic variability under well-watered and water-stressed conditions, Field Crops Research, 31, 173, 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90059-V · doi:10.1016/0378-4290(93)90059-v
  12. Yordanov, 2003, Plant responses to drought and stress tolerance, Bulgarian Journal of Plant Physiology Special Issue, 187

Cited by

See all 355

Metadata

Authors
Efeoğlu, B., Ekmekçi, Y., & Çiçek, N.
Venue
South African Journal of Botany
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-01
Volume
75
Issue
1
Pages
34-42
ISSN
0254-6299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094175790
Cited by
355
References
50
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.sajb.2008.06.005
The paper
Efeoğlu, B., Ekmekçi, Y., & Çiçek, N. (2009). Physiological responses of three maize cultivars to drought stress and recovery. South African Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2008.06.005

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.