Cited by 62Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Low-resolution structural modeling of protein interactome

Open access
Vakser, Ilya A·2013·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Abstract

Structural characterization of protein-protein interactions across the broad spectrum of scales is key to our understanding of life at the molecular level. Low-resolution approach to protein interactions is needed for modeling large interaction networks, given the significant level of uncertainties in large biomolecular systems and the high-throughput nature of the task. Since only a fraction of protein structures in interactome are determined experimentally, protein docking approaches are increasingly focusing on modeled proteins. Current rapid advancement of template-based modeling of protein-protein complexes is following a long standing trend in structure prediction of individual proteins. Protein-protein templates are already available for almost all interactions of structurally characterized proteins, and about one third of such templates are likely correct.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2012.12.003

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein shape, reflecting the protein fold, to a large extent determines the docking solution, even at coarse-grained representation.

    “Another important consideration is that the protein shape, reflecting the protein fold, to a large extent determines the docking solution, even at coarse-grained representation [11].”

    From Challenges in protein docking (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vakser, I. A.
Affiliations
University of Kansas (US)
Corresponding author
Vakser, Ilya A
Venue
Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
198-205
ISSN
0959-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021343666
Cited by
62
References
77
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 13
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • KU ScholarWorks (University of Kansas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM074255)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
protein-protein interaction, protein-protein interaction network, protein docking, template-based modeling, protein-protein complex, interaction networks, structural uncertainty
MeSH terms
Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Proteins, Proteome, Protein Interaction Mapping, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review