The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How do intrinsically disordered protein regions encode a driving force for liquid–liquid phase separation?
Open accessAbstract
Liquid-liquid phase separation is the mechanism underlying the formation of biomolecular condensates. Disordered protein regions often drive phase separation, but molecular interactions of disordered protein regions are not well understood, sometimes leading to the conflation that all disordered protein regions drive phase separation. Given the critical role of phase separation in many cellular processes, and that dysfunction of phase separation can lead to debilitating diseases, it is important that we understand the interactions and sequence properties underlying phase behavior. A conceptual framework that divides IDRs into interacting and solvating regions has proven particularly useful, and analytical instantiations and coarse-grained models can test our understanding of the driving forces against experimental phase behavior. Validated simulation paradigms enable the exploration of sequence space to help our understanding of how disordered protein regions can encode phase behavior, which IDRs may mediate phase separation in cells, and which IDRs are in contrast highly soluble.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coactivator condensation at super-enhancers links phase separation and gene control
Sabari, B. R., Dall’Agnese, A., Boija, A., Klein, I. A., Coffey, E. L., Shrinivas, K., Abraham, B. J., Hannett, N. M., Zamudio, A. V., Manteiga, J. C., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aar3958 · Cited by 2,595
Insights into RNA Biology from an Atlas of Mammalian mRNA-Binding Proteins
Castello, A., Fischer, B., Eichelbaum, K., Horos, R., Beckmann, B. M., Strein, C., Davey, N. E., Humphreys, D. T., Preiss, T., Steinmetz, L. M., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.031 · Cited by 2,132
Kato, M., Han, T. W., Xie, S., Shi, K., Du, X., Wu, L. C., Mirzaei, H., Goldsmith, E. J., Longgood, J., Pei, J., et al. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.017 · Cited by 2,012
Intrinsic Disorder and Protein Function
Dunker, A. K., Brown, C. J., Lawson, J. D., Iakoucheva, L. M., & Obradović, Z. (2002) · Biochemistry · doi:10.1021/bi012159+ · Cited by 1,731 · cited 1×
“IDRs often harbor many post-translation modification (PTM) sites because they are accessible for modifying enzymes, offering a mechanism for biology to regulate phase behavior [32-34].”
BackgroundValence and patterning of aromatic residues determine the phase behavior of prion-like domains
Martin, E. W., Holehouse, A. S., Peran, I., Farag, M., Incicco, J. J., Bremer, A., Grace, C. R., Soranno, A., Pappu, R. V., & Mittag, T. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaw8653 · Cited by 1,147
Self-citationAcetylation Disfavors Tau Phase Separation
Ferreon, J. C., Jain, A., Choi, K.-J., Tsoi, P. S., MacKenzie, K. R., Jung, S. Y., & Ferreon, A. C. (2018) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms19051360 · Cited by 183
Cited by
Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2
Alderson, T. R., Pritišanac, I., Kolarić, Đ., Moses, A. M., & Forman-Kay, J. D. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2304302120 · Cited by 240
Ainani, H., Bouchmaa, N., Ben Mrid, R., & El Fatimy, R. (2023) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106011 · Cited by 54
Liquid − liquid phase separation of tau: Driving forces, regulation, and biological implications
Li, P., Chen, J., Wang, X., Su, Z., Gao, M., & Huang, Y. (2023) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2023.106167 · Cited by 30
Tau liquid–liquid phase separation: At the crossroads of tau physiology and tauopathy
Islam, M., Shen, F., Regmi, D., Petersen, K., Karim, M. R. U., & Du, D. (2024) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.30853 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Borcherds, W., Bremer, A., Borgia, M. B., & Mittag, T.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Structural Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 41-50
- ISSN
- 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047984729
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
