Cited by 240Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Systematic identification of conditionally folded intrinsically disordered regions by AlphaFold2

Open access
Alderson, T. Reid, Pritišanac, Iva, Kolarić, Đesika, Moses, Alan M., Forman-Kay, Julie D.·2023·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The AlphaFold Protein Structure Database contains predicted structures for millions of proteins. For the majority of human proteins that contain intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs), which do not adopt a stable structure, it is generally assumed that these regions have low AlphaFold2 confidence scores that reflect low-confidence structural predictions. Here, we show that AlphaFold2 assigns confident structures to nearly 15% of human IDRs. By comparison to experimental NMR data for a subset of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold (i.e., upon binding or under other specific conditions), we find that AlphaFold2 often predicts the structure of the conditionally folded state. Based on databases of IDRs that are known to conditionally fold, we estimate that AlphaFold2 can identify conditionally folding IDRs at a precision as high as 88% at a 10% false positive rate, which is remarkable considering that conditionally folded IDR structures were minimally represented in its training data. We find that human disease mutations are nearly fivefold enriched in conditionally folded IDRs over IDRs in general and that up to 80% of IDRs in prokaryotes are predicted to conditionally fold, compared to less than 20% of eukaryotic IDRs. These results indicate that a large majority of IDRs in the proteomes of human and other eukaryotes function in the absence of conditional folding, but the regions that do acquire folds are more sensitive to mutations. We emphasize that the AlphaFold2 predictions do not reveal functionally relevant structural plasticity within IDRs and cannot offer realistic ensemble representations of conditionally folded IDRs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2304302120

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [80]V. N. Uversky, J. R. Gillespie, A. L. Fink, Why are “natively unfolded” proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 41, 415– 427 (2000). 11025552

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alderson, T. R., Pritišanac, I., Kolarić, Đ., Moses, A. M., & Forman-Kay, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Forman-Kay, Julie D.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2023-10-25
Volume
120
Issue
44
Pages
e2304302120-e2304302120
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W4387934645
Cited by
240
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 16
FWCI
19.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • CIHR (FDN-148375, PJT-148532, Canada Research Chair in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins, Canada Research Chair in Computational Biology, Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship)
  • The Hospital for Sick Children (LiUNA! Fellowship for Research Innovation)
  • Canada Foundation for Innovation (John R. Evans Leaders Fund)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
intrinsically disordered regions, AlphaFold2, protein structure prediction, pathogenic variants, structural plasticity
MeSH terms
Humans, Protein Conformation, Eukaryota, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review