Cited by 109Education, Achievement, and GiftednessEducational Outcomes and InfluencesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

The relationship between self-efficacy and academic achievement in high school students

Open access
Motlagh, Shahrzad Elahi, Amrai, Kourosh, Yazdani, Mohammad Javad, Abderahim, Haitham altaib, Souri, Hossein·2011·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Aim of the current study was to investigate the relation between self-efficacy and academic achievement in high school students. In this study, 250 students in the academic year 2010/2011 were selected by means of multistage cluster sampling and completed self-efficacy scale. To measure achievement score grade point average in classes was used. To analyze data correlation coefficient and regression analysis was used. analysis of data revealed that self-evaluation, selfdirecting and self-regulation are correlated with academic achievement. Among all variables entered in the equation model only self-evaluation and self-regulation entered the regression model explaining 10 percent variance of academic achievement in 2 steps. according to the results, self-efficacy is a considerable factor in academic achievement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.180

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  2. Mishaelides, M.(2008) Emerging themes from early research on self-fficacy beliefs in school mathematics. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational psychology, 14,219-234.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Motlagh, S. E., Amrai, K., Yazdani, M. J., Abderahim, H. A., & Souri, H.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
  • University of Tehran (IR)
Corresponding author
Amrai, Kourosh
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Volume
15
Pages
765-768
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045607022
Cited by
109
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.02
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Outcomes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
self-efficacy, academic performance, high school students, self-assessment, self-regulation, self-direction, grade point average

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review