Cited by 2,813Education, Achievement, and GiftednessBehavioral Health and InterventionsMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Negative Self-Efficacy and Goal Effects Revisited

Bandura, Albert, Locke, Edwin A.·2003·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

The authors address the verification of the functional properties of self-efficacy beliefs and document how self-efficacy beliefs operate in concert with goal systems within a sociocognitive theory of self-regulation in contrast to the focus of control theory on discrepancy reduction. Social cognitive theory posits proactive discrepancy production by adoption of goal challenges working in concert with reactive discrepancy reduction in realizing them. Converging evidence from diverse methodological and analytic strategies verifies that perceived self-efficacy and personal goals enhance motivation and performance attainments. The large body of evidence, as evaluated by 9 meta-analyses for the effect sizes of self-efficacy beliefs and by the vast body of research on goal setting, contradicts findings (J. B. Vancouver, C. M. Thompson, & A. A. Williams, 2001; J. B. Vancouver, C. M. Thompson, E. C. Tischner, & D. J. Putka 2002) that belief in one's capabilities and personal goals is self-debilitating.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-9010.88.1.87

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Encountering failure during goal pursuit triggers feelings of discouragement and undermines belief in one's ability to ultimately reach that goal.

    “Encountering failure during goal pursuit triggers feelings of discouragement (Heath, Larrick and Wu 1999) and undermines belief in one's ability to ultimately reach that goal (Bandura and Locke 2003; Latham and Locke 2006).”

    From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Bandura and Locke 2003

  • Attributing goal failure to one's own actions reduces self-efficacy and future goal pursuit.

    “Past research suggests that attributing goal failure to one's own actions reduces self-efficacy and future goal pursuit (e.g., Bandura and Locke 2003).”

    From On or Off Track: How (Broken) Streaks Affect Consumer Decisions (2023) · cites this paper as Bandura and Locke 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2003
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
87-99
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W2169724509
Cited by
2,813
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 88 · 2025: 110 · 2024: 123 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 174 · 2021: 182 · 2020: 210 · 2019: 181 · 2018: 153 · 2017: 148 · 2016: 158 · 2015: 154 · 2014: 149 · 2013: 142 · 2012: 112
FWCI
8.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
self-efficacy, goal setting, self-regulation, social cognitive theory, motivation, performance
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Cognition, Goals, Humans, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Social Behavior, Stress, Psychological, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review