Cited by 57Personality Traits and PsychologyStudent Stress and CopingStress and Burnout Research

An investigation of the relationship between personality dimensions and stress coping styles

Open access
karimzade, Atefe, besharat, mohammad ali·2011·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

Purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between personality dimensions and coping styles with stress. Method was correlation study in which 300 students (150 girls, 150 boys) were selected from Malayer University. An extensive analysis was performed to assess the kind of association exist among five personality factors personality (neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness) and three coping strategies (problem-focused, positive emotional-focused and negative emotional-focused). All participants were asked to complete the NEO-FFI personality inventory and the Tehran Coping Styles Scale (TCSS). Results indicated that Neuroticism was negatively correlated with positive emotional-focused coping style and was positively correlated with negative emotional-focused coping style in female students, while it was positively correlated with negative emotional-focused coping styles in male students. Extraversion was positively correlated with problem-focused and positive emotional-focused coping style in both male and female students. Openness was positively correlated with problem- focused coping styles in female students. Agreeableness was positively correlated with problem-focused and positive emotional- focused coping styles and negatively correlated with negative emotional-focused coping style in male, while it was positively correlated with problem- focused coping style and negatively correlated with negative emotional-focused coping style in female students. Conscientiousness were positively correlated with problem-focused coping style and negatively correlated with negative emotional-focused coping style in both male and female students. Discussin: personality dimensions were associated with coping strategies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.155

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
karimzade, A., & besharat, M. A.
Corresponding author
karimzade, Atefe
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011
Volume
30
Pages
797-802
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016347585
Cited by
57
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
personality factors, stress coping styles, Big Five personality traits, neuroticism, extraversion, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, problem-focused coping, gender differences, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review