Cited by 54Management and Optimization TechniquesReliability and Maintenance OptimizationQuality and Supply Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Maintenance Management and Lean Manufacturing Practices in a Firm Which Produces Dairy Products

Open access
Arslankaya, Seher, Atay, Hatice·2015·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

While enterprises are struggling to go on existing in the intensive competitive environment, unexpected breakdowns occur at unexpected times, thereby leading to the emergence of halts in production and to hitches in production plans. As a result, enterprises suffer from the loss of revenue as they fail to hit the production quantity that they have aimed at. The fact that the maintenance plans have been made well is an important issue in the prevention of the losses due to breakdowns within an enterprise. This gains more importance particularly when the production system grows and the production quantity increases. It is necessary to plan the activities to be carried out to ensure that the machines and plants of enterprises are working continuously. All management activities concerning the practices including such issues as the determination of maintenance priorities as well as preparation and supervision of maintenance plans are carried out with maintenance management. This study described the implementation of maintenance management and lean manufacturing techniques at the maintenance workshop in order to eliminate the losses due to breakdowns and to enhance productivity and the motivation of employees at an enterprise which produced dairy products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.090

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Bevilacqua, M. ve Braglia, M. (2000). The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection, Reliability Engineering and System Safety. 70 (2), 71-83.
  2. Chan, F.T. S., Lau, H.C. W., Ip, R.W. L., Chan, H.K., and Kong, S., (2005), Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance: A Case Study. International Journal of Production Economics, 95, 71-94. · DOI
  3. Dhillion, B.S. (2002), Engineering maintenance a modern approach, CRC Press, 1 edition, ISBN: 1-58716-142-7.
  4. George, M.L., Maxey J., Rowlands D., Price, M., (2004). The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook. McGraw-Hill; 1 edition. ISBN-10: 0071441190. ISBN-13: 978-0071441193.
  5. Görener, A., Yenen, Z., (2007), İşletmelerde toplam verimli bakim çalişmalari kapsaminda yapilan faaliyetler ve verimliliğe katkilari. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 6(11), 47-63.
  6. Heizer, J. ve Render, B. (2012). Operations Management, USA: Pearson Education Inc., ISBN-10: 0132921146. ISBN-13: 978-0132921145. Prentice Hall; 11 edition.
  7. Hodge, G.L., Ross, K.G., Joines, J.A., Thoney, K.A., (2011). Adapting lean manufacturing principles to the textile industry. Production planning and control, 22(3), 237-247. · DOI
  8. Marquez, A.C. . (2007), The maintenance management framework, Springer; 2007 edition, ISBN-10: 1846288207. ISBN-13: 978-1846288203.
  9. Mobley, K.R., (2002), An introduction to predictivite maintenance,. ISBN-10: 0123996376. ISBN-13: 978-0123996374. Butterworth Heinemann. Second edition.
  10. Monks, J.G. (1996). İşlemler Yönetimi, Schaum's Outline Series, USA: McGraw-Hill, Second Edition, ISBN: 9755910895. Translated by: Sevinç Üreten, Nobel Yayın.
  11. Miyake, D.I., Enkawa, T., and Fleury, A.C. C., (1995). Improving manufacturing systems performance by complementary application of Just-In-Time, Total quality control and total productive maintenance paradigms. Total Quality Management, 6, 4, 345-363. · DOI
  12. Patra, N.K., Tripathy, J. K, and Choudhary, B. K, (2005). Implementing the office total productive maintenance-office TPM- Program: A library case study. Library review, 54, 7, 415-424. · DOI
  13. Salem, O., Solomon, H., Genaidy, A., Minkarah, I., (2006). “Lean construction from theory to implementation”, Journal of Management in Engineering, 22(4), 168-175. · DOI
  14. Wireman,T. (2013), Maintenance Work Management, Reliabilityweb.com, 3 edition, ISBN:978-1-939740-12-0.
  15. Womack, J.P.,Jones, D.T., Roos, D. (2007), “The machine that changed the World: The Story of Lean Production-Toyota's Secret Weapon in the Global Car Wars That Is The Machine That Changed the World- Now Revolutionizing World Industry New York: Rawson Macmillan. Free Press; Reprint edition. ISBN-10: 0743299795. ISBN-13: 978-0743299794.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arslankaya, S., & Atay, H.
Affiliations
Sakarya University (TR)
Corresponding author
Arslankaya, Seher
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
207
Pages
214-224
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2232311531
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3
FWCI
20.15
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Sakarya Üniversitesi Kurumsal Açık Akademik Arşivi (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
Keywords
maintenance management, lean manufacturing, dairy industry, machine breakdowns, maintenance planning, maintenance prioritization, maintenance workshop, productivity improvement, employee motivation, production losses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review