CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31Open Source Software InnovationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesDigital Platforms and Economics

The evolution of OSS governance: a dimensional comparative analysis

De Noni, Ivan, Ganzaroli, Andrea, Orsi, Luigi·2013·Scandinavian Journal of Management
DOI 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The broad decentralization and openness of OSS facilitate open collaboration that transcends institutional boundaries yet simultaneously remove resources for accountability and governance.

    “The broad decentralization and openness of OSS facilitate open collaboration that transcends institutional boundaries yet simultaneously remove resources for accountability and governance, meaning that successful projects have to build their own approaches [22, 77, 94].”

    From Paradoxes of Openness: Trans Experiences in Open Source Software (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Noni, I., Ganzaroli, A., & Orsi, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Padua (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
247-263
ISSN
0956-5221 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.003
OpenAlex
W1979686352
Cited by
31
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Community‘s Seventh Framework Programme FP7 (225349)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
open source software, governance mechanisms, community governance, community sustainability, innovation process, freshmeat, open source communities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review