Cited by 143Schizophrenia research and treatmentAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

A DTI study of white matter microstructure in individuals at high genetic risk for schizophrenia

HOPTMAN, M, NIERENBERG, J, BERTISCH, H, CATALANO, D, ARDEKANI, B, BRANCH, C, DELISI, L·2008·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Structural brain developmental anomalies, particularly those in frontotemporal white matter pathways, may have a genetic component and place people at increased risk for schizophrenia. The current study employed Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) to measure fractional anisotropy (FA) as a quantitative indicator of white matter integrity. We examined twenty-two participants at high genetic risk for schizophrenia (HR), 23 people with schizophrenia (most of whom were family members of those at HR) and 37 non-psychiatric controls for comparison. In those at HR, reduced FA was observed in the cingulate and angular gyri bilaterally. In a few regions, FA was higher in HR participants than in comparison participants. These regional variations in FA might reflect differences in white matter development from comparison participants. Our data provide some evidence that abnormal white matter integrity may be detectable before the onset of a psychotic illness, although longitudinal studies are necessary to determine whether these individuals at genetic risk with abnormal FA will develop illness and whether these changes are associated with the genetic risk for the disorder.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2008.07.023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among familial high-risk schizophrenia studies, only a minority find cingulum changes, with other structures more often affected.

    “Only a minority of these familial studies find cingulum changes, with other structures more often affected (e.g., Clark et al., 2011; Hoptman et al., 2008; Karlsgodt et al., 2009; Maniega et al., 2008).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Hoptman et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HOPTMAN, M., NIERENBERG, J., BERTISCH, H., CATALANO, D., ARDEKANI, B., BRANCH, C., & DELISI, L.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • New York University (US)
Corresponding author
DELISI, L
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
106
Issue
2-3
Pages
115-124
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972797655
Cited by
143
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
9.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for Advanced Brain Imaging
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH64783, MH71720, R01MH064783, R21MH071720)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
schizophrenia, high genetic risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Neural Pathways, Risk Factors, Schizophrenia, Anisotropy, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review