The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Characteristics of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery in a 29-site antipsychotic schizophrenia clinical trial
Abstract
Objective The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Project produced a battery of tests, the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB), designed to assess cognitive treatment effects in clinical trials of patients with schizophrenia. In validation studies, the MCCB demonstrated excellent reliability, minimal practice effects and significant correlations with measures of functional capacity. This study addresses whether the MCCB demonstrates these favorable characteristics when administered in the context of the type of large multi-site industry trial for which it was designed.Methods In a clinical trial comparing risperidone and lurasidone, 323 clinically-stable outpatients with schizophrenia at 29 sites were assessed with MCCB at screening and a median of 15days later at baseline. A measure of functional capacity, the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment-Brief (UPSA-B) was administered at baseline.Results All 323 (100%) patients had sufficient data for computing a composite score according to the MCCB criteria. The test-retest reliability of the MCCB composite score was excellent (ICC=0.88). The severity of cognitive impairment was T=24.7 (SD=12.1) at screening and T=26.7 (SD=12.4) at baseline. The MCCB composite score demonstrated a large correlation with the UPSA-B composite score (r=.60, df=304, p<.001). The practice effect on the composite score was small (z=0.18).Discussion In the context of a 29-site antipsychotic trial in stable outpatients with schizophrenia, the MCCB is sensitive to cognitive deficits in all domains, demonstrates excellent test-retest reliability and small practice effects, and is strongly correlated with a leading measure of functional capacity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Early results suggest that good psychometric characteristics of the cognitive outcome measure are possible in large multisite studies if sufficient care is given to training and data quality.21”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“These favorable psychometric properties have also been observed in the context of a large multisite industry trial for which it was designed.21”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [21]
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426 · Cited by 2,798
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity
Nuechterlein, K. H., Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Baade, L. E., Barch, D. M., Cohen, J. D., Essock, S., Fenton, W. S., Frese, F. J., Gold, J. M., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042 · Cited by 2,342
Self-citationGreen, M. F., Nuechterlein, K. H., Gold, J. M., Barch, D. M., Cohen, J., Essock, S., Fenton, W. S., Frese, F., Goldberg, T. E., Heaton, R. K., et al. (2004) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.06.023 · Cited by 919
Self-citationThe MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 2: co-norming and standardization
Kern, R. S., Nuechterlein, K. H., Green, M. F., Baade, L. E., Fenton, W. S., Gold, J. M., Keefe, R. S. E., Mesholam-Gately, R., Mintz, J., Seidman, L. J., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010043 · Cited by 744
Self-citationStatistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Sockloff, A. L. (1978) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(78)90080-0 · Cited by 715
Buchanan, R. W. (2005) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbi020 · Cited by 438
Initial phase 2 trial of a nicotinic agonist in schizophrenia
Freedman, R., Olincy, A., Buchanan, R. W., Harris, J. G., Gold, J. M., Johnson, L., Allensworth, D., Guzman-Bonilla, A., Clement, B., Ball, M. P., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07071135 · Cited by 426
Goldberg, T. E., GOLDMAN, R. S., Burdick, K. E., Malhotra, A. K., Lencz, T., Patel, R. C., Woerner, M. G., Schooler, N. R., Kane, J. M., & Robinson, D. G. (2007) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.10.1115 · Cited by 396
Development of a Brief Scale of Everyday Functioning in Persons with Serious Mental Illness
Mausbach, B. T., Harvey, P. D., Goldman, S. R., Jeste, D. V., & Patterson, T. L. (2006) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm014 · Cited by 381
Self-citationLeifker, F. R., Bowie, C. R., & Harvey, P. D. (2009) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2009.09.004 · Cited by 226
Self-citationBuchanan, R. W., Keefe, R. S. E., Umbricht, D., Green, M. F., Laughren, T., & Marder, S. R. (2011) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbq038 · Cited by 154
Self-citationGoldberg, T. E., Keefe, R. S. E., GOLDMAN, R. S., Robinson, D. G., & Harvey, P. D. (2010) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.211 · Cited by 129
Self-citationVentura, J., Reise, S., Keefe, R., Baade, L., Gold, J., Green, M. F., Kern, R., Mesholam-Gately, R., Nuechterlein, K., Seidman, L., et al. (2010) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.04.016 · Cited by 92
Self-citationLieberman, J. A., Javitch, J. A., & Moore, H. M. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050769 · Cited by 53
Barch, D. M., & Carter, C. S. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbn037 · Cited by 51
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Millan, M. J., Agid, Y., Brüne, M., Bullmore, E. T., Carter, C. S., Clayton, N. S., Connor, R., Davis, S., Deakin, B., DeRubeis, R. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3628 · Cited by 1,292
Schizophrenia Is a Cognitive Illness: Time for a Change in Focus
Kahn, R. S., & Keefe, R. S. E. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.155 · Cited by 825
Self-citationCognitive impairment in schizophrenia: aetiology, pathophysiology, and treatment
McCutcheon, R. A., Keefe, R. S. E., & McGuire, P. K. (2023) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-023-01949-9 · Cited by 861
Self-citationCognitive Impairment in Schizophrenia
Keefe, R. S. E., & Harvey, P. D. (2012) · Handbook of experimental pharmacology · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25758-2_2 · Cited by 528
Self-citationMemory and cognition in schizophrenia
Guo, J. Y., Ragland, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0231-1 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Keefe, R. S. E., Fox, K. H., Harvey, P. D., Cucchiaro, J., Siu, C., & Loebel, A.
- Affiliations
- Duke University (US)
- Verasci (United States) (US)
- University of Miami (US)
- Sunovion (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Keefe, Richard S.E.
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 161-168
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169310695
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- CHDI Foundation
- H. Lundbeck A/S
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, schizophrenia
- MeSH terms
- Lurasidone Hydrochloride, Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Thiazoles, Antipsychotic Agents, Reproducibility of Results, Risperidone, Isoindoles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review