Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Cognitive therapies for psychosis: Advances and challenges

Medalia, Alice, Beck, Aaron T., Grant, Paul M.·2019·Schizophrenia Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.021

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Medalia, A., Beck, A. T., & Grant, P. M.
Affiliations
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Medalia, Alice
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-01
Volume
203
Pages
1-2
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811215327
Cited by
14
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness-based group therapy, schizophrenia spectrum disorders
MeSH terms
Cognitive Remediation, Humans, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review