Cited by 38Plant tissue culture and regenerationGenetics and Plant BreedingDate Palm Research Studies

Somaclonal variation in olive (Olea europaea L.) plants regenerated via somatic embryogenesis: Influence of genotype and culture age on genetic stability

Bradaï, Fatiha, Sánchez-Romero, Carolina, Martín, Carmen·2019·Scientia Horticulturae

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.03.010

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bradaï, F., Sánchez-Romero, C., & Martín, C.
Affiliations
Universidad de Málaga (ES)
Venue
Scientia Horticulturae
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
251
Pages
260-266
ISSN
0304-4238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4243754622
Cited by
38
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Scientia Horticulturae (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Date Palm Research Studies
Keywords
somaclonal variation, olive, Olea europaea, somatic embryogenesis, genetic stability, genotype-dependent variation, culture age, embryogenic lines, RAPD markers, microsatellite markers, micropropagation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review