Cited by 246Soil Science and Environmental ManagementSoil Geostatistics and MappingHeavy metals in environment

Soil monitoring in Europe: a review of existing systems and requirements for harmonisation

Morvan, X., Saby, N.P.A., Arrouays, D., Le Bas, C., Jones, R.J.A., Verheijen, F.G.A., Bellamy, P.H., Stephens, M. +1 more·2008·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Official frameworks for soil monitoring exist in most member states of the European Union. However, the uniformity of methodologies and the scope of actual monitoring are variable between national systems. This review identifies the differences between existing systems, and describes options for harmonising soil monitoring in the Member States and some neighbouring countries of the European Union. The present geographical coverage is uneven between and within countries. In general, national and regional networks are much denser in northern and eastern regions than in southern Europe. The median coverage in the 50 km x 50 km EMEP cells applied all over the European Union, is 300 km(2) for one monitoring site. Achieving such minimum density for the European Union would require 4100 new sites, mainly located in southern countries (Italy, Spain, Greece), parts of Poland, Germany, the Baltic countries, Norway, Finland and France. Options are discussed for harmonisation of site density, considering various risk area and soil quality indicator requirements.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.046

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some indicators such as organic carbon (or soil organic matter) content and pH are often measured, whereas others such as bulk density or earthworm diversity are rarely assessed.

    “However, some indicators such as organic carbon (or soil organic matter) content and pH are often measured, whereas others such as bulk density or earthworm diversity are rarely assessed (Morvan et al., 2008).”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Morvan et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morvan, X., Saby, N. P. A., Arrouays, D., Le Bas, C., Jones, R. J. A., Verheijen, F. G. A., Bellamy, P. H., Stephens, M., & Kibblewhite, M. G.
Affiliations
  • Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (FR)
  • Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
  • Cranfield University (GB)
Corresponding author
Morvan, X.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-02
Volume
391
Issue
1
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150480154
Cited by
246
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
Keywords
soil monitoring, soil quality indicators, EU member states, Southern Europe, soil quality assessment
MeSH terms
Environmental Monitoring, Europe, European Union, International Cooperation, Soil Pollutants, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review