Cited by 168Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Science and Environmental ManagementInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology

Biological measurements in a nationwide soil monitoring network

Open access
Rutgers, M., Schouten, A. J., Bloem, J., Van Eekeren, N., De Goede, R. G. M., Jagersop Akkerhuis, G. A. J. M., Van der Wal, A., Mulder, C. +2 more·2009·European Journal of Soil Science

Abstract

Summary In the Netherlands soil biological measurements are undertaken in a nationwide monitoring programme. The measurements are combined in the Biological Indicator of Soil Quality (BISQ). About 300 locations were selected in a random stratified design comprising stringent combinations of land use and soil type. All locations were sampled in a six‐year cycle. In this contribution we describe the monitoring network and the BISQ and present average values for biomass, abundances and taxonomic diversity of various soil dwelling organisms derived from 10 years of measurements. We further highlight some results and discuss the possibilities in soil and land management policy frameworks for improving sustainable land management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01163.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rutgers, M., Schouten, A. J., Bloem, J., Van Eekeren, N., De Goede, R. G. M., Jagersop Akkerhuis, G. A. J. M., Van der Wal, A., Mulder, C., Brussaard, L., & Breure, A. M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Rutgers, M.
Venue
European Journal of Soil Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
820-832
ISSN
  • 1351-0754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2389
OpenAlex
W2071141678
Cited by
168
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
FWCI
18.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Soil Science (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Keywords
soil organisms, soil biodiversity, soil biomass, species abundance, taxonomic diversity, soil fauna, land use, soil type, sustainable land management, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review