The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in indoor dust
Open accessAbstract
Human exposure to indoor dust enriched with endocrine-disrupting chemicals released from numerous indoor sources has been a focus of increasing concern. Longer residence times and elevated contaminant concentrations in the indoor environment may increase chances of exposure to these contaminants by 1000-fold compared to outdoor exposure. To investigate the occurrence of semi-volatile endocrine-disrupting chemicals, including PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers), PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), phthalates, pyrethroids, DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) and its metabolites, and chlordanes, indoor dust samples were collected from household vacuum cleaner bags provided by 10 apartments and 1 community hall in Davis, California, USA. Chemical analyses show that all indoor dust samples are highly contaminated by target analytes measured in the present study. Di-(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate was the most abundant (104–7630 μg/g) in all samples and higher than other target analytes by 2 to 6 orders of magnitude. PBDEs were also found at high concentrations (1780–25,200 ng/g). Although the use of PCBs has been banned or restricted for decades, some samples had PCBs at levels that are considered to be concerns for human health, indicating that the potential risk posed by PCBs still remains high in the indoor environment, probably due to a lack of dissipation processes and continuous release from the sources. Although the use of some PBDEs is being phased out in some parts of the U.S., this trend may apply to PBDEs as well. We can anticipate that exposure to PBDEs will continue as long as the general public keeps using existing household items such as sofas, mattresses, and carpets that contain PBDEs. This study provides additional information that indoor dust is highly contaminated by persistent and endocrine-disrupting chemicals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pyrethroids: Exposure and health effects – An update
Saillenfait, A.-M., Ndiaye, D., & Sabaté, J.-P. (2015) · International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health · doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2015.01.002 · Cited by 454
Frye, C., Bo, E., Calamandrei, G., Calzà, L., Dessì‐Fulgheri, F., Fernández, M., Fusani, L., Kah, O., Kajta, M., Le Page, Y., et al. (2012) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2011.02229.x · Cited by 431
Lucattini, L., Poma, G., Covaci, A., de Boer, J., Lamoree, M. H., & Leonards, P. E. G. (2018) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.02.161 · Cited by 359
Organic Contamination of Settled House Dust, A Review for Exposure Assessment Purposes
Mercier, F., Glorennec, P., Thomas, O., & Bot, B. L. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es200925h · Cited by 255
Larsson, M., Weiss, B., Janson, S., Sundell, J., & Bornehag, C.-G. (2009) · NeuroToxicology · doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2009.01.011 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Hwang, H.-M., Park, E.-K., Young, T. M., & Hammock, B. D.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 404
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 26-35
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2040012101
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in indoor dust. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.031
- The paper
- Hwang, H.-M., Park, E.-K., Young, T. M., & Hammock, B. D. (2008). Occurrence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in indoor dust. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.05.031
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.