The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey as a function of species, size, and season
Open accessAbstract
There are few data on risks to biota and humans from mercury levels in saltwater fish. This paper examines mercury and selenium levels in muscle of 19 species of fish caught by recreational fisherfolk off the New Jersey shore, as a function of species of fish, size, and season, and risk of mercury to consumers. Average mercury levels ranged from 0.01 ppm (wet weight) (Menhaden Brevoortia tyrannus) to 1.83 ppm (Mako Shark Isurus oxyrinchus). There were four categories of mercury levels: very high (only Mako), high (averaging 0.3–0.5 ppm, 3 species), medium (0.14–0.20 ppm, 10 species), and low (below 0.13 ppm, 5 species). Average selenium levels for the fish species ranged from 0.18 ppm to 0.58 ppm, and had lower variability than mercury (coefficient of variation=38.3 vs 69.1%), consistent with homeostatic regulation of this essential element. The correlation between mercury and selenium was significantly positive for five and negative for two species. Mercury levels showed significant positive correlations with fish size for ten species. Size was the best predictor of mercury levels. Selenium showed no consistent relationship to fish length. Over half of the fish species had some individual fish with mercury levels over 0.3 ppm, and a third had fish with levels over 0.5 ppm, levels that pose a human health risk for high end consumers. Conversely several fish species had no individuals above 0.5 ppm, and few above 0.3 ppm, suggesting that people who eat fish frequently, can reduce their risk from mercury by selecting which species (and which size) to consume. Overall, with the exception of shark, Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus), Bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix) and Striped Bass (Morone saxatilis), the species sampled are generally medium to low in mercury concentration. Selenium:mercury molar ratios were generally above 1:1, except for the Mako shark.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Salonen, J. T., Seppänen, K., Nyyssönen, K., Korpela, H., Kauhanen, J., Kantola, M., Tuomilehto, J., Esterbauer, H., Tatzber, F., & Salonen, R. (1995) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.91.3.645 · Cited by 578
Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and absorption
Gochfeld, M. (2003) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/s0147-6513(03)00060-5 · Cited by 485
Self-citationMercury in fish, bed sediment, and water from streams across the United States, 1998-2005
Scudder, B. C., Chasar, L. C., Wentz, D. A., Bauch, N. J., Brigham, M. E., Moran, P. W., & Krabbenhoft, D. P. (2009) · Scientific Investigations Report · doi:10.3133/sir20095109 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Heavy metals in marine fish meat and consumer health: a review
Bosch, A. C., O'Neill, B., Sigge, G. O., Kerwath, S. E., & Hoffman, L. C. (2016) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.7360 · Cited by 615
Metadata
- Authors
- Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 409
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1418-1429
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086795081
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey as a function of species, size, and season. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.034
- The paper
- Burger, J., & Gochfeld, M. (2011). Mercury and selenium levels in 19 species of saltwater fish from New Jersey as a function of species, size, and season. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.12.034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.