Cited by 485Mercury impact and mitigation studiesHeavy Metal Exposure and ToxicityEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability, and absorption

Gochfeld, Michael·2003·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

Mercury is a unique element that, unlike many metals, has no essential biological function. It is liquid at room temperature and is 13.6 times heavier than water. Its unique physical properties have been exploited for a variety of uses such as in mercury switches, thermostats, thermometers, and other instruments. Its ability to amalgamate with gold and silver are used in mining these precious metals and as a dental restorative. Its toxic properties have been exploited for medications, preservatives, antiseptics, and pesticides. For these reasons there have been many industrial uses of mercury, and occupational exposures of workers and industrial emissions and effluents contaminating air, water, soil, and ultimately food chains have long been a matter of great public health concern. This paper examines briefly six cases representing various forms of exposure to different species of mercury, and indicates the methodological issues in estimating exposure, bioavailability and absorption; these cases include Minamata disease in Japan, organic mercury poisoning in Iraq, methylmercury (MeHg) exposure in the Amazon, dimethylmercury (PMM) in the laboratory, an elemental mercury spill in Cajamarca, Peru, and a mercury-contaminated building in Hoboken, NJ, USA. Other scenarios that are not described include occupational exposure to mercury salts, mercurial preservatives in vaccines, cultural and ritualistic uses of mercury, and mercury in dental amalgams.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0147-6513(03)00060-5

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gochfeld, M.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Gochfeld, Michael
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
174-179
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087082909
Cited by
485
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 34
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Heavy Metal Exposure and Toxicity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
mercury exposure, mercury toxicity, bioavailability, mercury uptake, Minamata disease, organic mercury poisoning, methylmercury, dimethylmercury, occupational mercury exposure, mercury contamination, exposure assessment
MeSH terms
Absorption, Accidents, Animals, Biological Availability, Brazil, Environmental Exposure, Fishes, Humans, Iraq, Japan, Mercury, Methylmercury Compounds, Occupational Exposure, Mercury Poisoning, Nervous System, Food Chain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review