Cited by 79Extraction and Separation ProcessesMining and Resource ManagementSustainable Supply Chain Management

Sustainable governance of scarce metals: the case of lithium

Prior, Timothy, Wäger, Patrick A., Stamp, Anna, Widmer, Rolf, Giurco, Damien·2013·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Minerals and metals are finite resources, and recent evidence suggests that for many, primary production is becoming more difficult and more expensive. Yet these resources are fundamentally important for society--they support many critical services like infrastructure, telecommunications and energy generation. A continued reliance on minerals and metals as service providers in modern society requires dedicated and concerted governance in relation to production, use, reuse and recycling. Lithium provides a good example to explore possible sustainable governance strategies. Lithium is a geochemically scarce metal (being found in a wide range of natural systems, but in low concentrations that are difficult to extract), yet recent studies suggest increasing future demand, particularly to supply the lithium in lithium-ion batteries, which are used in a wide variety of modern personal and commercial technologies. This paper explores interventions for sustainable governance and handling of lithium for two different supply and demand contexts: Australia as a net lithium producer and Switzerland as a net lithium consumer. It focuses particularly on possible nation-specific issues for sustainable governance in these two countries' contexts, and links these to the global lithium supply chain and demand scenarios. The article concludes that innovative business models, like 'servicizing' the lithium value chain, would hold sustainable governance advantages for both producer and consumer c…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.042

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prior, T., Wäger, P. A., Stamp, A., Widmer, R., & Giurco, D.
Affiliations
  • Empa (CH)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
461-462
Pages
785-791
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021429431
Cited by
79
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion)
  • OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Mining and Resource Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
lithium, sustainable governance, critical minerals, lithium supply chain, lithium demand, lithium-ion batteries, recycling, servitization, value chain, Australia, Switzerland, resource constraints
MeSH terms
Australia, Commerce, Conservation of Natural Resources, Lithium, Switzerland, Government Regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review