CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exposure and risk characterization for dietary methylmercury from seafood consumption in Kuwait

Laird, Brian, Chan, Hing Man, Kannan, Kurunthachalam, Husain, Adnan, Al-Amiri, Hanan, Dashti, Basma, Sultan, Anwar, Al-Othman, Amani, Al-Mutawa, Faten·2017·Science of The Total Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.033
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Seafood is an important source of essential nutrients; however, it can also confer health risks from methylmercury (MeHg). In this paper, we evaluate the levels of potential methylmercury exposure among Kuwaiti seafood consumers in order to support the development of dietary recommendations for fish consumption in Kuwait. Total mercury (HgT) concentration for most of the studied fish and shellfish species were on average below the 0.5μgg -1 Codex guideline. The notable exception to this was Hamoor (Epinephelus coioides), which averaged 1.29μgg -1 HgT and 0.55μgg -1 MeHg. A dietary survey of 2393 households demonstrated that large quantities of fish and shellfish are commonly consumed in Kuwait (average consumption: 103gd -1 ). Most participants (53.6%) exceeded the Tolerable Daily Intake of MeHg; this percent exceedance was as high as 78% in children 6-12years of age. The majority (Mean: 50-51%) of Kuwaiti's dietary MeHg exposure comes from the consumption of Hamoor; therefore, advisories to limit the consumption of Hamoor may be necessary. Nutrient:Methylmercury ratios are reported herein; these ratios may assist efforts to create dietary advice that limits contaminant risk while promoting the nutritional benefits of seafood in Kuwait.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.033

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Al-Majed, 2000, An assessment of the total and methyl mercury content of zooplankton and fish tissue collected from Kuwait territorial waters, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 40, 298, 10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00217-9 · DOI
  2. Anan, 2001, Trace element accumulation in hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) and green turtles (Chelonia mydas) from Yaeyama Islands, Japan, Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 20, 2802, 10.1002/etc.5620201220 · DOI
  3. Boucher, 2008, Does selenium exert cardioprotective effects against oxidative stress in myocardial ischemia?, Acta Physiol. Hung., 95, 187, 10.1556/APhysiol.95.2008.2.3 · DOI
  4. Cappon, 1981, Mercury and selenium content and chemical form in fish muscle, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 10, 305, 10.1007/BF01055632 · DOI
  5. Chapman, 2011, Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management, Eur. Heart J., 32, 1345, 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr112 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Clemens, 2011, Mercury speciation analysis in seafood by species-specific isotope dilution: method validation and occurrence data, Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 401, 2699, 10.1007/s00216-011-5040-1 · DOI
  7. Dabeka, 2004, Survey of total mercury in some edible fish and shellfish species collected in Canada in 2002, Food Addit. Contam., 21, 434, 10.1080/02652030410001670184 · DOI
  8. Dewailly, 2008, Balancing the risks and the benefits of local fish consumption in Bermuda, Food Additives and Contaminants Part a-Chemistry Analysis Control Exposure & Risk Assessment, 25, 1328
  9. Evans, 2012, Fish consumption, mercury intake, and the associated risks to the Kuwaiti population, Hum. Ecol. Risk. Assess., 18, 1014, 10.1080/10807039.2012.710473 · DOI
  10. Forsyth, 2004, Methylmercury levels in predatory fish species marketed in Canada, Food Addit. Contam., 21, 849, 10.1080/02652030400004259 · DOI
  11. Hellberg, 2012, Risk-benefit analysis of seafood consumption: a review, Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 11, 490, 10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00200.x · DOI
  12. Husain, 2017, A comparative assessment of arsenic risks and the nutritional benefits of fish consumption in Kuwait: arsenic versus omega 3-fatty acids, Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 72, 108, 10.1007/s00244-016-0329-x · DOI
  13. Kensova, 2012, Mercury speciation and safety of fish from important fishing locations in the Czech Republic, Czech J. Food Sci., 30, 276, 10.17221/239/2011-CJFS · DOI
  14. Laird, 2013, Dietary advice on Inuit traditional food use needs to balance benefits and risks of mercury, selenium, and n3 fatty acids, J. Nutr., 143, 923, 10.3945/jn.112.173351 · DOI
  15. Liang, 2011, The influence of mariculture on mercury distribution in sediments and fish around Hong Kong and adjacent mainland China waters, Chemosphere, 82, 1038, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.10.061 · DOI
  16. Madden, 2009, Direct diet quantification indicates low intakes of (n-3) fatty acids in children 4 to 8years old, J. Nutr., 139, 528, 10.3945/jn.108.100628 · DOI
  17. Ralston, 2016, Selenium health benefit values: updated criteria for mercury risk assessments, Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 171, 262, 10.1007/s12011-015-0516-z · DOI
  18. Reyes, 2017, Associations between omega-3 fatty acids, selenium content, and mercury levels in wild-harvested fish from the Dehcho Region, Northwest Territories, Canada, J. Toxic. Environ. Health A, 80, 18, 10.1080/15287394.2016.1230916 · DOI
  19. Smith, 2010, Mercury concentrations and omega-3 fatty acids in fish and shrimp: preferential consumption for maximum health benefits, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 60, 1615, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.06.045 · DOI
  20. Tonkin, 2014, Treatment of dyslipidemia, F1000prime reports, 6, 17, 10.12703/P6-17 · DOI
  21. Ursini, 1987, The role of selenium peroxidases in the protection against oxidative damage of membranes, Chem. Phys. Lipids, 44, 255, 10.1016/0009-3084(87)90053-3 · DOI
  22. Wang, 2013, In vitro estimation of exposure of Hong Kong residents to mercury and methylmercury via consumption of market fishes, J. Hazard. Mater., 248, 387, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.12.060 · DOI
  23. Zmozinski, 2014, Method development for the simultaneous determination of methylmercury and inorganic mercury in seafood, Food Control, 46, 351, 10.1016/j.foodcont.2014.05.054 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Laird, B., Chan, H. M., Kannan, K., Husain, A., Al-Amiri, H., Dashti, B., Sultan, A., Al-Othman, A., & Al-Mutawa, F.
ORCID
Laird, Brian
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-12
Volume
607-608
Pages
375-380
ISSN
0048-9697
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.033
Cited by
22
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review