Cited by 68Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactPesticide Exposure and Toxicity

The development of a pregnancy PBPK Model for Bisphenol A and its evaluation with the available biomonitoring data

Open access
Sharma, Raju Prasad, Schuhmacher, Marta, Kumar, Vikas·2018·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Recent studies suggest universal fetal exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) and its association with the adverse birth outcomes. Estimation of the fetal plasma BPA concentration from the maternal plasma BPA would be highly useful to predict its associated risk to this specific population. The objective of current work is to develop a pregnancy-physiologically based pharmacokinetic (P-PBPK) model to predict the toxicokinetic profile of BPA in the fetus during gestational growth, and to evaluate the developed model using biomonitoring data obtained from different pregnancy cohort studies. To achieve this objective, first, the adult PBPK model was developed and validated with the human BPA toxicokinetic data. This validated human PBPK model was extended to develop a P-PBPK model, which included the physiological changes during pregnancy and the fetus sub-model. The developed model would be able to predict the BPA pharmacokinetics (PKs) in both mother and fetus. Transplacental BPA kinetics parameters for this study were taken from the previous pregnant mice study. Both oral and dermal exposure routes were included into the model to simulate total BPA internal exposure. The impact of conjugation and deconjugation of the BPA and its metabolites on fetal PKs was investigated. The developed P-PBPK model was evaluated against the observed BPA concentrations in cord blood, fetus liver and amniotic fluid considering maternal blood concentration as an exposure source. A range of maternal exposu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.023

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sharma et al. developed a p-PBPK model for bisphenol A where the fetal compartment also encompassed organs like brain, liver, and kidney.

    “Sharma et al. developed a p-PBPK model for bisphenol A where the fetal compartment also encompassed organs like brain, liver, and kidney (Sharma et al., 2018).”

    From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma et al., 2018

  • The Sharma model predicted higher mid-gestation exposure in the fetal liver, in agreement with some observational studies.

    “The model predicted higher mid-gestation exposure in the fetal liver in agreement with some observational studies.”

    From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma et al., 2018

  • Validation of models on rapidly-metabolized compounds will remain challenging due to differing lifestyle variables just prior to sampling in biomonitoring studies and functional genetic variations in metabolizing enzymes in different populations.

    “Although the model by Sharma showed good potential, the authors acknowledged that validation of models on rapidly-metabolized com­ pounds will remain challenging due not only to differing lifestyle vari­ ables just prior sampling in biomonitoring studies, but also functional genetic variations in metabolizing enzymes in different populations.”

    From Pregnancy-related maternal physiological adaptations and fetal chemical exposure (2023) · cites this paper as Sharma et al., 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharma, R. P., Schuhmacher, M., & Kumar, V.
Affiliations
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (ES)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Vikas
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
624
Pages
55-68
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772476494
Cited by
68
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rovira & Virgili repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Universitat Rovira i Virgili
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (633172)
  • Seventh Framework Programme (603946)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Keywords
bisphenol A, pregnancy, physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling, prenatal exposure, transplacental transfer, umbilical cord blood, amniotic fluid, fetal liver, dermal exposure, oral exposure, critical windows of exposure, adverse birth outcomes
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Benzhydryl Compounds, Environmental Monitoring, Female, Humans, Models, Biological, Phenols, Pregnancy, Maternal Exposure, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review