Cited by 46Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ranking connectivity risk for phosphorus loss along agricultural drainage ditches

Open access
Moloney, Thomas, Fenton, Owen, Daly, Karen·2020·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Agricultural drainage systems comprising both in-field pipe drains and surface ditches are typically installed to remove excess water from agricultural land. These drainage networks can provide connectivity between phosphorus (P) sources and surface waters thereby increasing the risk of P loss to rivers and streams. The objective of this study was to derive a farm-scale drainage ranking that categorises drainage ditches in terms of P loss risk based on connectivity and physic-chemical characteristics. Ten pilot farms were selected to characterise drainage networks through ground survey and, sediment and water sampling. Five drainage ditch categories were derived based on landscape setting and connectivity. Each category recorded soluble and reactive P concentrations above environmental water quality standards. To assess the risk of surface ditches as a connectivity vector between agricultural P and surface waters ditches were ranked in order of P loss risk by integrating landscape position and sediment P chemistry. Elevated sediment P with high equilibrium P concentration (EPCo) were associated with ditches connected to farm yards, and in sediment sampled at ditch outlets, suggesting P deposition over time indicative of a legacy P source. The greatest risk of P loss was attributed to ditches connecting farm yards to streams, and ditches that connected the drainage network to surface waters, or Outlets. These results rank connectivity risk for P loss along agricultural drainage ditches for farm level risk assessment to target P loss mitigation measures to the appropriate locations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134556

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As flow regimes in ditches change seasonally following either natural hydrological cycles or human activities, water retention time in ditches can vary dramatically, with consequences for biogeochemical function.

    “As flow regimes in ditches change seasonally following either natural hydrological cycles or human activities 123 , water retention time in ditches can vary dramatically, with consequences for biogeochemical function 11,109,124 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [109]

  • Whether a ditch is connected to a stream network has important implications for flow direction, the transport and magnitude of lateral chemical fluxes, and pollution risks for downstream ecosystems.

    “Whether a ditch is connected to a stream network has important implications for flow direction, the transport and magnitude of lateral chemical fluxes, and pollution risks for downstream ecosystems 109 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [109]

  • Many ditches are subject to gradual sediment and organic matter accumulation from alluvium, fine sediments, in-situ degradation of plants, and bank erosion, necessitating occasional dredging to maintain original hydraulic function.

    “Regardless of channel substrate, many ditches are subject to gradual sediment and organic matter accumulation both in the form of alluvium from upstream reaches, fine sediments brought in by the tide in coastal areas, insitu degradation of plants, and via bank erosion 108,109 , necessitating occasional dredging to maintain original hydraulic function 110,111 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [109]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Moloney, T., Fenton, O., & Daly, K.
Affiliations
Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Corresponding author
Moloney, Thomas
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
703
Pages
134556
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2983832681
Cited by
46
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, Ireland (2017-W-LS-15)
  • Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
phosphorus loss, agricultural drainage ditches, sediment phosphorus, equilibrium phosphorus concentration, legacy phosphorus, surface water quality, phosphorus mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review