The DOI matches its Crossref record; 225 of the 225 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical review of mercury speciation, bioavailability, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant environment: Ecotoxicology and health risk assessment
Abstract
Environmental contamination by a non-essential and non-beneficial, although potentially toxic mercury (Hg), is becoming a great threat to the living organisms at a global scale. Owing to its various uses in numerous industrial processes, high amount of Hg is released into different environmental compartments. Environmental Hg contamination can result in food chain contamination, especially due to its accumulation in edible plant parts. Consumption of Hg-rich food is a key source of Hg exposure to humans. Since Hg does not possess any identified biological role and has genotoxic and carcinogenic potential, it is critical to monitor its biogeochemical behavior in the soil-plant system and its influence in terms of possible food chain contamination and human exposure. This review traces a plausible link among Hg levels, its chemical speciation and phytoavailability in soil, accumulation in plants, phytotoxicity and detoxification of Hg inside the plant. The role of different enzymatic (peroxidase, catalase, ascorbate peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione peroxidase) and non-enzymatic (glutathione, phytochelatins, proline and ascorbic acid) antioxidants has also been elucidated with respect to enhanced generation of reactive radicles and resulting oxidative stress. The review also outlines Hg build-up in edible plant tissues and associated health risks. The biogeochemical role of Hg in the soil-plant system and associated health risks have been described with well summarized and up-to-date data in 12 tables and 4 figures. We believe that this comprehensive review article and meta-analysis of Hg data can be greatly valuable for scientists, researchers, policymakers and graduate-level students.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trace Elements in Soils and Plants
Kabata-Pendias, A. (2010) · doi:10.1201/b10158 · Cited by 11,918
Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 · Cited by 11,663
Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance
Mittler, R. (2002) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9 · Cited by 10,764
Sharma, P., Jha, A. B., Dubey, R. S., & Pessarakli, M. (2012) · Journal of Botany · doi:10.1155/2012/217037 · Cited by 5,473
Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthesis: The Basics
Krause, G. H., & Weis, E. (1991) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.42.060191.001525 · Cited by 4,179
Heavy metals, occurrence and toxicity for plants: a review
Nagajyoti, P. C., Lee, K. D., & Sreekanth, T. V. M. (2010) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-010-0297-8 · Cited by 3,962
Das, K., & Roychoudhury, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2014.00053 · Cited by 3,122
Foyer, C. H., & Noctor, G. (2005) · The Plant Cell · doi:10.1105/tpc.105.033589 · Cited by 2,952
Role of proline under changing environments: A review
Hayat, S., Hayat, Q., Alyemeni, M. N., Wani, A. S., Pichtel, J., & Ahmad, A. (2012) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.4161/psb.21949 · Cited by 2,823
The Toxicology of Mercury and Its Chemical Compounds
Clarkson, T. W., & Magos, L. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Toxicology · doi:10.1080/10408440600845619 · Cited by 2,371
Cited by
Zinc in soil-plant-human system: A data-analysis review
Natasha, N., Shahid, M., Bibi, I., Iqbal, J., Khalid, S., Murtaza, B., Bakhat, H. F., Farooq, A. B. U., Amjad, M., Hammad, H. M., et al. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152024 · Cited by 226
Self-citationAbidli, A., Huang, Y., Ben Rejeb, Z., Zaoui, A., & Park, C. B. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133102 · Cited by 194
Thakur, M., Praveen, S., Divte, P. R., Mitra, R., Kumar, M., Gupta, C. K., Kalidindi, U., Bansal, R., Roy, S., Anand, A., et al. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131957 · Cited by 167
Omics approaches for understanding heavy metal responses and tolerance in plants
Jamla, M., Khare, T., Joshi, S., Patil, S., Penna, S., & Kumar, V. (2021) · Current Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cpb.2021.100213 · Cited by 152
Metadata
- Authors
- Natasha, Shahid, M., Khalid, S., Bibi, I., Bundschuh, J., Khan Niazi, N., & Dumat, C.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 711
- Pages
- 134749
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2986762518
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 225
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Status
- Retracted
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A critical review of mercury speciation, bioavailability, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant environment: Ecotoxicology and health risk assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134749
- The paper
- Natasha, Shahid, M., Khalid, S., Bibi, I., Bundschuh, J., Khan Niazi, N., & Dumat, C. (2020). A critical review of mercury speciation, bioavailability, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant environment: Ecotoxicology and health risk assessment. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134749
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.