The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy
Abstract
The role of a reliable carbon emissions measurement is important for devising a relevant climate policy to deals with environmental problems. Based on trade adjusted statistics of carbon emissions, a relevant climate policy response can be provided, especially following the conference of Paris (COP, 21). To explore the unidentified determinants of CO2 emissions in G7 countries from 1990 to 2017, this study uses second-generation panel co-integration methodologies. Results of P&Y's slope heterogeneity test and Pesaran's CD test confirm the existence of correlation among cross-sectional units and slope heterogeneity across countries. The results confirm a stable long-run relationship among CO2 emissions, trade, income, environmental innovation and renewable energy consumption. In the long run, imports and income enhance consumption-based carbon emissions, while exports, environmental innovation and renewable energy consumption are helpful in abating consumption-based CO2 emissions. The results are also reconfirmed by Augmented Mean Group (AMG) and Common Correlated Effect Mean Group (CCEMG) methods. Based on the results of the Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) Granger causality test, it is argued that any policy to target exports, imports, income and environmental innovation significantly changes CO2 emissions. On the contrary, any policy to support environmental degradation does not affect these variables. Moreover, any policy to target renewable energy sources significantly affects consumption-based CO2 emissions and vice versa. This might lead the policymakers to adopt strategies that are eco-friendly such as the deployment of renewable energy and environmental innovation to attain sustainable environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Diffenbaugh, N. S. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay2368 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Hao, L.-N., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Ali, W. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141853 · Cited by 785
Self-citationAhmad, M., Jiang, P., Majeed, A., Umar, M., Khan, Z., & Muhammad, S. (2020) · Resources Policy · doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101817 · Cited by 773
Self-citationAl-Shetwi, A. Q. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153645 · Cited by 703
How does fiscal decentralization affect CO2 emissions? The roles of institutions and human capital
Khan, Z., Ali, S., Dong, K., & Li, R. Y. M. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2020.105060 · Cited by 607
Self-citationAhmad, M., Jiang, P., Murshed, M., Shehzad, K., Akram, R., Cui, L., & Khan, Z. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102881 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, Z., Ali, S., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., & Jiao, Z.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 730
- Pages
- 138945
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3020881573
- Cited by
- 694
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 99.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945
- The paper
- Khan, Z., Ali, S., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., & Jiao, Z. (2020). Consumption-based carbon emissions and International trade in G7 countries: The role of Environmental innovation and Renewable energy. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.