The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals
Open accessAbstract
Climate change and the overexploitation of natural resources increase the need to integrate sustainable development policies at both national and international levels to fit the demands of a growing population. In 2015 the United Nations (UN) established the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development with the aim of eradicating extreme poverty, reducing inequality and protecting the planet. The Agenda 2030 highlights the importance of biodiversity and the functioning of ecosystems to maintain economic activities and the well-being of local communities. Nature Based Solutions (NBS) support biodiversity conservation and the functioning of ecosystems. NBS are increasingly seen as innovative solutions to manage water-related risks while transforming natural capital into a source of green growth and sustainable development. In this context, NBS could potentially contribute to the achievement of several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by promoting the delivery of bundles of ecosystem services together generating various social, economic and environmental co-benefits. However, to achieve the full potential of NBS, it is necessary to recognize the trade-offs and synergies of the co-benefits associated with their implementation. To this aim, we have adopted a system perspective and a multi-sectoral approach to analyse the potential of NBS to deliver co-benefits while at the same time reducing the negative effects of water-related hazards. Using the case study of Copenhagen, we have analysed the relationships between the co-benefits associated with the scenario of the restoration of the Ladegaardsaa urban river. Our hypothesis is that enhancing the understanding of the social, economic and environmental factors of the system, including mutual influences and trade-offs, could improve the decision-making process and thereby enhance the capability of NBS to contribute to the achievement of the SDGs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kosko, B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80040-2 · Cited by 3,576
Voinov, A., & Bousquet, F. (2010) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007 · Cited by 1,354
Cited by
Principles for urban nature-based solutions
Kabisch, N., Frantzeskaki, N., & Hansen, R. (2022) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-021-01685-w · Cited by 272
Carvalho, P. N., Finger, D. C., Masi, F., Cipolletta, G., Oral, H. V., Tóth, A., Regelsberger, M., & Exposito, A. (2022) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130652 · Cited by 115
Nature-based Systems (NbS) for mitigation of stormwater and air pollution in urban areas: A review
Biswal, B. K., Bolan, N., Zhu, Y.-G., & Balasubramanian, R. (2022) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106578 · Cited by 113
Nastran, M., Pintar, M., Železnikar, Š., & Cvejić, R. (2022) · Land · doi:10.3390/land11020299 · Cited by 47
Schipfer, F., Pfeiffer, A., & Hoefnagels, R. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15020433 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Gómez Martín, E., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., van der Keur, P., & Máñez Costa, M.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 738
- Pages
- 139693
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3033083323
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693
- The paper
- Gómez Martín, E., Giordano, R., Pagano, A., van der Keur, P., & Máñez Costa, M. (2020). Using a system thinking approach to assess the contribution of nature based solutions to sustainable development goals. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.