Cited by 3,576Cognitive Science and MappingBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceCognitive Computing and Networks

Fuzzy cognitive maps

Kosko, Bart·1986·International Journal of Man-Machine Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80040-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • FCM is an evidence-based methodology proven as a reliable knowledge-based model that facilitates sense-making by helping program participants communicate strategies and decisions.

    “FCM is an evidence-based methodology proven as a reliable knowledge-based model that facilitates “sense-making” by helping program participants communicate strategies and decisions [7, 8].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kosko, B.
Corresponding author
Kosko, Bart
Venue
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-01
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
65-75
ISSN
0020-7373 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095224843
Cited by
3,576
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 152 · 2025: 189 · 2024: 198 · 2023: 193 · 2022: 201 · 2021: 205 · 2020: 219 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 179 · 2017: 155 · 2016: 160 · 2015: 169 · 2014: 166 · 2013: 171 · 2012: 167
FWCI
4.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Science and Mapping
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
fuzzy cognitive maps, causal reasoning, fuzzy relations, causal propagation, forward and backward chaining, knowledge base, causal concepts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review