The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles: Implications of future electricity mix and different battery end-of-life management
Open accessAbstract
The environmental performance of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) is influenced by their battery size and charging electricity source. Therefore, assessing their environmental performance should consider changes in the electricity sector and refurbishment of their batteries. This study conducts a scenario-based Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of three different scenarios combining four key parameters: future changes in the charging electricity mix, battery efficiency fade, battery refurbishment, and recycling for their collective importance on the life-cycle environmental performance of a BEV. The system boundary covers all the life-cycle stages of the BEV and includes battery refurbishment, except for its second use stage. The refurbished battery was modelled considering refurbished components and a 50% cell conversation rate for the second life of 5 years. The results found a 9.4% reduction in climate impacts when future changes (i.e., increase in the share of renewable energy) in the charging electricity are considered. Recycling reduced the BEV climate impacts by approximately 8.3%, and a reduction smaller than 1% was observed for battery refurbishment. However, the battery efficiency fade increases the BEV energy consumption, which results in a 7.4 to 8.1% rise in use-stage climate impacts. Therefore, it is vital to include battery efficiency fade and changes to the electricity sector when estimating the use-stage impacts of BEVs; without this, LCA results could be unreliable. The sensitivity analysis showed the possibility of a higher reduction in the BEV climate impacts for longer second lifespans (>5 years) and higher cell conversation rates (>50%). BEV and battery production are the most critical stages for all the other impact categories assessed, specifically contributing more than 90% to mineral resource scarcity. However, recycling and battery refurbishment can reduce the burden of the different impact categories considered. Therefore, manufacturers should design BEV battery packs while considering recycling and refurbishment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology
Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E., & Weidema, B. (2016) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1087-8 · Cited by 5,564
ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level
Huijbregts, M. A. J., Steinmann, Z. J. N., Elshout, P. M. F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Zijp, M., Hollander, A., & van Zelm, R. (2017) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1246-y · Cited by 4,485
Degradation diagnostics for lithium ion cells
Birkl, C. R., Roberts, M. R., McTurk, E., Bruce, P. G., & Howey, D. A. (2017) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.011 · Cited by 1,945 · cited 1×
“Since the traction battery capacity and energy ef fi ciency degrades over time and cycling (Birkl et al., 2017), Eftekhari (2017) and Redondo-Iglesias et al. (2019) found that the decrease in battery energy ef fi ciency can directly in fl uence the lifetime energy consumption of BEVs.”
The environmental impact of Li-Ion batteries and the role of key parameters – A review
Peters, J. F., Baumann, M., Zimmermann, B., Braun, J., & Weil, M. (2017) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.039 · Cited by 856
The transport sector as a source of air pollution
Colvile, R. N., Hutchinson, E. J., Mindell, J. S., & Warren, R. F. (2001) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00551-3 · Cited by 769
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665
Environmental impacts of hybrid and electric vehicles—a review
Hawkins, T. R., Gausen, O. M., & Strømman, A. H. (2012) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0440-9 · Cited by 601
Nordelöf, A., Messagie, M., Tillman, A.-M., Ljunggren Söderman, M., & Van Mierlo, J. (2014) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0788-0 · Cited by 543
Self-citationBauer, C., Hofer, J., Althaus, H.-J., Del Duce, A., & Simons, A. (2015) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.019 · Cited by 430
Battery second life: Hype, hope or reality? A critical review of the state of the art
Martinez-Laserna, E., Gandiaga, I., Sarasketa-Zabala, E., Badeda, J., Stroe, D.-I., Swierczynski, M., & Goikoetxea, A. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.035 · Cited by 426
Cited by
Cost, energy, and carbon footprint benefits of second-life electric vehicle battery use
Dong, Q., Liang, S., Li, J., Kim, H. C., Shen, W., & Wallington, T. J. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.107195 · Cited by 110
E-fuels in IC engines: A key solution for a future decarbonized transport
Uchida, N., Onorati, A., Novella, R., Agarwal, A. K., Abdul-Manan, A. F., Kulzer, A. C., Iorio, S. D., Gordillo, V., Günthner, M., Jena, A., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Engine Research · doi:10.1177/14680874251325296 · Cited by 35
Sustainable Development Goals and End-of-Life Electric Vehicle Battery: Literature Review
Akram, M. N., & Abdul-Kader, W. (2023) · Batteries · doi:10.3390/batteries9070353 · Cited by 32
A multi-scale lifecycle and technoeconomic framework for higher education fleet electrification
Juang, J., Williams, W. G., Ramshankar, A. T., Schmidt, J., Xuan, K., & Bozeman, J. F. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-54752-z · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Koroma, M. S., Costa, D., Philippot, M., Cardellini, G., Hosen, M. S., Coosemans, T., & Messagie, M.
- Venue
- Science of The Total Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 831
- Pages
- 154859
- ISSN
- 0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4220812760
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 13.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles: Implications of future electricity mix and different battery end-of-life management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154859
- The paper
- Koroma, M. S., Costa, D., Philippot, M., Cardellini, G., Hosen, M. S., Coosemans, T., & Messagie, M. (2022). Life cycle assessment of battery electric vehicles: Implications of future electricity mix and different battery end-of-life management. Science of The Total Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.