Cited by 12Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and BehaviorFish Ecology and Management StudiesEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Identifying freshwater priority areas for cross-taxa interactions

Open access
Nogueira, Joana Garrido, Lopes-Lima, Manuel, Beja, Pedro, Filipe, Ana Filipa, Froufe, Elsa, Gonçalves, Duarte V., da Silva, Janine P., Sousa, Ronaldo +3 more·2023·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Information about biotic interactions (e.g. competition, predation, parasitism, diseases, mutualism, allelopathy) is fundamental to better understand species distribution and abundance, ecosystem functioning, and ultimately guide conservation efforts. However, conservation planning often overlooks these important interactions. Here, we aim to demonstrate a new framework to include biotic interactions into Marxan. For that, we use freshwater mussels and fish interaction (as mussels rely on fishes to complete their life cycle) in the Douro River basin (Iberian Peninsula) as a case study. While doing that, we also test the importance of including biotic interactions into conservation planning exercises, by running spatial prioritisation analysis considering either: 1) only the target species (freshwater mussels); 2) freshwater mussels and their obligatory hosts (freshwater fishes); 3) freshwater mussels, fishes and their interactions. With this framework we found that biotic interactions tend to be underrepresented when the data on both freshwater mussels and fishes is not simultaneously included in the spatial prioritisation. Overall, the priority areas selected across all scenarios are mostly located in the western part of the Douro River basin, where most freshwater mussels and fishes still occur. Given the low overlap of priority areas identified here and the current Natura 2000 network, our approach may be useful for establishing (or enlarging) protected areas, especially in light of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Also, this work may provide guidance for future habitat restoration and management of main threats to freshwater biodiversity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161073

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Kadwa Kosi site provides a perfect ground for bird tourism, and each year many naturalists and ornithologists from India and abroad visit the breeding sites of the Greater Adjutants and interact with the local community involved in bird conservation.

    “The site provides a perfect ground for bird tourism and each year many naturalists and ornithologists from India and abroad visit the breeding sites of the Greater Adjutants and interact with the local community involved in bird conservation.131”

    From Protecting and restoring habitats to benefit freshwater biodiversity (2024) · cites this paper as [131]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ball, I.R., Possingham, H.P., Watts, M.E., 2009. Marxan and relatives: software for spatial con- servation prioritization. In: Moilanen, A., Wilson, K.A., Possingham, H.P. (Eds.), Spatial Conservation Prioritisation: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools, pp. 185-210.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nogueira, J. G., Lopes-Lima, M., Beja, P., Filipe, A. F., Froufe, E., Gonçalves, D. V., da Silva, J. P., Sousa, R., Teixeira, A., Varandas, S., & Hermoso, V.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • Centro Interdisciplinar de Investigação Marinha e Ambiental (PT)
  • University of Minho (PT)
  • Universidade Politécnica de Bragança (PT)
  • University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (PT)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nogueira, Joana Garrido
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-03
Volume
864
Pages
161073
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4312211082
Cited by
12
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RepositóriUM (Universidade do Minho) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (2020.03872, 2020.04637, EMERGIA20_00135, PTDC/AAGMAA/2261/2014 – POCI-01-0145-FEDER-356016824)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
species interactions, spatial prioritization, conservation planning, freshwater mussels, freshwater fish, Marxan, priority areas, Douro River basin, Natura 2000, protected area planning, freshwater biodiversity conservation, EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030
MeSH terms
Animals, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fishes, Fresh Water, Ecosystem, Biodiversity, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review