Cited by 23biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionMicrobial bioremediation and biosurfactants

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 260 of the 267 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Analytical tools to assess polymer biodegradation: A critical review and recommendations

Open access
Colachis, Matthew, Lilly, Jacob L., Trigg, Edward, Kucharzyk, Katarzyna H.·2024·Science of The Total Environment

Abstract

Many petroleum-derived plastic materials are highly recalcitrant and persistent in the environment, posing significant threats to human and ecological receptors due to their accumulation in ecosystems. In recent years, research efforts have focused on advancing biological methods for polymer degradation. Enzymatic depolymerization has emerged as particularly relevant for biobased plastic recycling, potentially scalable for industrial use. Biodegradation involves adsorption to the plastic solid surface, followed by an interfacial reaction, resulting in cleavage of bonds of polymer chains exposed on the surface. Here, widely varying substrate-specific kinetics are observed, with the polymer's properties possessing a significant impact on the rate of this interfacial catalysis. Thus, there is a critical need for sensitive and accurate characterization of the material surface during and after interfacial depolymerization to fully understand the reaction mechanisms. Here, we provide a critical review of a range of techniques used in the analysis of material surfaces to characterize the chemical, topological, and morphological features relevant to the study of enzymatic biocatalysis, including microscopy techniques, spectroscopic techniques (e.g., X-ray diffraction analysis, Fourier transform infrared attenuated total reflectance spectroscopy, and mass spectrometry detection of analytes associated with degradation). Techniques for evaluation of surface energy and topology in their relevancy for sensitive detection of biological surface modifications are also discussed. In addition, this paper provides an overview of the strengths of these techniques and compares their performance in both sensitivity and throughput, including emerging techniques, which can be useful, particularly for the rapid analysis of the surface properties of polymeric materials in high-throughput screening of candidate biocatalysts. This research serves as a starting point in selecting and applying appropriate methodologies that provide direct evidence to the ongoing biotic degradation of polymeric materials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176920

Cites

260 of 260 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 267 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Albertsson, 1998, Molecular weight changes and polymeric matrix changes correlated with the formation of degradation products in biodegraded polyethylene, Journal of environmental polymer degradation, 6, 187, 10.1023/A:1021873631162 · DOI
  2. Awasthi, 2017, Biodegradation of thermally treated high-density polyethylene (HDPE) by Klebsiella pneumoniae CH001. 3, Biotech, 7, 1
  3. Cai, 1996, Effects of physical aging, crystallinity, and orientation on the enzymatic degradation of poly (lactic acid), J. Polym. Sci. B Polym. Phys., 34, 2701, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0488(19961130)34:16<2701::AID-POLB2>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  4. Ikada, 1999, Electron microscope observation of biodegradation of polymers, Journal of environmental polymer degradation, 7, 197, 10.1023/A:1022882732403 · DOI
  5. Kawai, 2014, A novel Ca2+−activated, thermostabilized polyesterase capable of hydrolyzing polyethylene terephthalate from Saccharomonospora viridis AHK190, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98, 10053, 10.1007/s00253-014-5860-y · DOI
  6. Kim, 2020, Functional expression of polyethylene terephthalate-degrading enzyme (PETase) in green microalgae, Microb. Cell Factories, 19, 1, 10.1186/s12934-020-01355-8 · DOI
  7. Koontz, 2010, Polymer processing and characterization of LLDPE films loaded with α-tocopherol, quercetin, and their cyclodextrin inclusion complexes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 117, 2299, 10.1002/app.32044 · DOI
  8. Li, 2017, Fast and sensitive ellipsometry-based biosensing. Sensors, 18, 15
  9. Luthra, 2020, Biodegradation studies of polypropylene/natural fiber composites, SN Applied Sciences, 2, 1, 10.1007/s42452-020-2287-1 · DOI
  10. Marković, 2016, Polymer characterization (II), Polymer science: Research advances, practical applications and educational aspects, 397
  11. Matjašič, 2021, Critical evaluation of biodegradation studies on synthetic plastics through a systematic literature review, Sci. Total Environ., 752, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141959 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Mirabella, 1998, vol. 14
  13. Ojha, 2017, Evaluation of HDPE and LDPE degradation by fungus, implemented by statistical optimization, Sci. Rep., 7, 1, 10.1038/srep39515 · DOI
  14. Orhan, 2004, Biodegradation of plastic compost bags under controlled soil conditions, Acta Chim. Slov., 51, 579
  15. Peez, 2020, Quantitative 1 H-NMR spectroscopy as an efficient method for identification and quantification of PVC, ABS and PA microparticles. Analyst, 145, 5363
  16. Picollo, 2018, UV-Vis spectroscopy. Physical sciences reviews, 4
  17. Stokes, 2003, Recent advances in electron imaging, image interpretation and applications: environmental scanning electron microscopy. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 361, 2771

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 23

Metadata

Authors
Colachis, M., Lilly, J. L., Trigg, E., & Kucharzyk, K. H.
Affiliations
  • Battelle (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University (US)
Corresponding author
Kucharzyk, Katarzyna H.
Venue
Science of The Total Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
955
Pages
176920
ISSN
0048-9697 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403850139
Cited by
21
References
267
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 7
FWCI
0.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Science of The Total Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Office of Science (DE-SC0022026)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants
Keywords
polymer biodegradation, enzymatic depolymerization, polymer surface characterization, interfacial catalysis, surface energy, surface topology, biocatalyst screening, plastic pollution, biodegradation kinetics, analytical method comparison
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Environmental Monitoring, Plastics, Polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review