CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 71

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Key performance indicators for Smart Campus and Microgrid

Alrashed, Saleh·2020·Sustainable Cities and Society
DOI 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102264
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102264

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Agbali, 2019, Are smart innovation ecosystems really seeking to meet citizens’ needs? Insights from the stakeholders’ vision on smart city strategy implementatio, Smart Cities, 2, 307, 10.3390/smartcities2020019 · DOI
  2. Agdas, 2015, Energy use assessment of educational buildings: Toward a campus-wide sustainable energy policy, Sustainable Cities and Society, 17, 15, 10.1016/j.scs.2015.03.001 · DOI
  3. Ahmed, 2018, A robust features based person tracker for overhead views in industrial environment, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 5, 1598, 10.1109/JIOT.2017.2787779 · DOI
  4. Akande, 2019, The Lisbon ranking for smart sustainable cities in Europe, Sustainable Cities and Society, 44, 475, 10.1016/j.scs.2018.10.009 · DOI
  5. Al Shimmary, 2015, Designing smart university using RFID and WSN, International Journal of Computer Applications, 112, 34
  6. Alwaer, 2010, Key performance indicators (KPIs) and priority setting in using the multi-attribute approach for assessing sustainable intelligent buildings, Building and Environment, 45, 799, 10.1016/j.buildenv.2009.08.019 · DOI
  7. Attila, 2014, Extensible data management architecture for smart campus applications—A crowdsourcing based solution, WEBIST, 226
  8. Bibri, 2017, Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review, Sustainable Cities and Society, 31, 183, 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Caţă, 2015, Smart university, a new concept in the internet of things, 14th RoEduNet International Conference - Networking in Education and Research (RoEduNet NER), Craiova, 195, 10.1109/RoEduNet.2015.7311993 · DOI
  10. Fortes, 2019, The campus as a smart city: University of málaga environmental, learning, and research approaches, Sensors, 19, 1349, 10.3390/s19061349 · DOI
  11. Ghanbari, 2017, Business development in the internet of things: A matter of vertical cooperation, IEEE Communications Magazine, 55, 135, 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1600596CM · DOI
  12. He, 2019, Performance analysis of a polling based access control combining with sleeping schema in V2I VANETs for smart cities, Sustainability, 11, 18, 10.3390/su11020503 · DOI
  13. Huang, 2019, A context aware smart classroom architecture for smart campuses, Applied Sciences, 9, 1837, 10.3390/app9091837 · DOI
  14. Khan, 2017, Enabling multimedia aware vertical handover management in internet of things based heterogeneous wireless networks, Multimedia Tools and Applications, 76, 10.1007/s11042-017-4736-4 · DOI
  15. Kwok, 2015, A vision for the development of i-campus, Smart Learning Environments-A Springer Open Journal, 2, 1
  16. Marquardt, 2017, Smart services – Characteristics, challenges, opportunities and business models, At Bucharest 11th International Conference on Business Excellence 2017, 11
  17. Min-Allah, 2020, Smart Campus-A sketch, Sustainable Cities and Society, 59, 10223, 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102231 · DOI
  18. Min-Allah, 2012, A comparative study of rate monotonic schedulability tests, The Journal of Supercomputing, 59, 1419, 10.1007/s11227-011-0554-z · DOI
  19. Min-Allah, 2019, Cost efficient resource allocation for real-time tasks in embedded systems, Sustainable Cities and Society, 48, 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101523 · DOI
  20. Musa, 2016, Smart cities - a roadmap for development, J Telecommun Syst Manage, 5, 3
  21. Pramangioulis, 2019, A methodology for determination and definition of key performance indicators for smart grids development in island energy systems, Energies, 12, 242, 10.3390/en12020242 · DOI
  22. Qureshi, 2020, Link quality and energy utilization based preferable next hop selection routing for wireless body area networks, Computer Communications, 149, 382, 10.1016/j.comcom.2019.10.030 · DOI
  23. Rathore, 2018, Real-time big data stream processing using GPU with spark over hadoop ecosystem, International Journal of Parallel Programming, 46, 630, 10.1007/s10766-017-0513-2 · DOI
  24. Vilajosana, 2013, Bootstrappingsmartcitiesthroughaself-sustainablemodel basedonbigdataflows, IEEE Communications Magazine, 51, 128, 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525605 · DOI
  25. Walravens, 2013, Platform business models for smart cities: From control and value to governance and public value, IEEE Communications Magazine, 51, 72, 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6525598 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 71

Metadata

Authors
Alrashed, S.
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
60
Pages
102264
ISSN
2210-6707
DOI
10.1016/j.scs.2020.102264
Cited by
71
References
2
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Deanship of Scientific Research
  • Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (2020-127-ASCS)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key performance indicators for Smart Campus and Microgrid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102264
The paper
Alrashed, S. (2020). Key performance indicators for Smart Campus and Microgrid. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102264