Cited by 1,599Smart Cities and TechnologiesSustainable Urban and Rural DevelopmentSustainable Design and Development

Smart sustainable cities of the future: An extensive interdisciplinary literature review

Open access
Bibri, Simon Elias, Krogstie, John·2017·Sustainable Cities and Society

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.016

Cites

177 of 177 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bibri, S. E., & Krogstie, J.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Bibri, Simon Elias
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
31
Pages
183-212
ISSN
2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2594141822
Cited by
1,599
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 204 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 206 · 2023: 184 · 2022: 164 · 2021: 214 · 2020: 178 · 2019: 152 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
95.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainable Cities and Society (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Sustainable Urban and Rural Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
Keywords
smart sustainable cities, urban sustainability, smart cities, sustainable urban planning, sustainable urban form, sustainable development, big data, context-aware computing, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review