The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scalable machine learning-based intrusion detection system for IoT-enabled smart cities
Abstract
Abstract Given a scale expansion of Internet of Things for sustainable resource management in smart cities, proper design of an intrusion detection system (IDS) is critical to safeguard the future network infrastructure from intruders. With the growth of connected things, the most-widely used centralized (cloud-based) IDS often suffers from high latency and network overhead, thereby resulting in unresponsiveness to attacks and slow detection of malicious users. In this paper, we address the limitation of centralized IDS for resource-constrained devices by proposing two methods, namely semi-distributed and distributed, that combine well-performing feature extraction and selection and exploit potential fog-edge coordinated analytics. In order to distribute the computational tasks, we individually develop parallel machine-learning models corresponding to a partitioned attack dataset. In the semi-distributed case, the parallel models, running on the edge side, are applied for side-by-side feature selections, which are then followed by a single multi-layer perceptron classification running on the fog side. In the distributed case, the parallel models individually perform both the feature selection and multi-layer perceptron classification after which the outputs are combined by a coordinating edge or fog for final decision making. Based on the comparative study of existing works, the numerical results demonstrate the promise of the proposed methods, giving a comparable detection accuracy to the superior centralized IDS as well as exemplify their inherent trade-offs between the accuracy and building time performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tariq, F., Khandaker, M., Wong, K.-K., Imran, M., Bennis, M., & Debbah, M. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.06700 · Cited by 1,014
Cloud-centric IoT based disease diagnosis healthcare framework
Verma, P., & Sood, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing · doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2017.11.018 · Cited by 246
Cited by
Moustafa, N. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102994 · Cited by 721
Abdullahi, M., Baashar, Y., Alhussian, H., Alwadain, A., Aziz, N., Capretz, L. F., & Abdulkadir, S. J. (2022) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics11020198 · Cited by 361
Moustafa, N., Koroniotis, N., Keshk, M., Zomaya, A. Y., & Tari, Z. (2023) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2023.3280465 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Rahman, M. A., Asyhari, A. T., Leong, L. S., Satrya, G. B., Hai Tao, M., & Zolkipli, M. F.
- Venue
- Sustainable Cities and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 61
- Pages
- 102324
- ISSN
- 2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3035366189
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scalable machine learning-based intrusion detection system for IoT-enabled smart cities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102324
- The paper
- Rahman, M. A., Asyhari, A. T., Leong, L. S., Satrya, G. B., Hai Tao, M., & Zolkipli, M. F. (2020). Scalable machine learning-based intrusion detection system for IoT-enabled smart cities. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102324
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.