Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 721

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A new distributed architecture for evaluating AI-based security systems at the edge: Network TON_IoT datasets

Open access
Moustafa, Nour·2021·Sustainable Cities and Society

Abstract

Abstract While there has been a significant interest in understanding the cyber threat landscape of Internet of Things (IoT) networks, and the design of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based security approaches, there is a lack of distributed architecture led to generating heterogeneous datasets that contain the actual behaviours of real-world IoT networks and complex cyber threat scenarios to evaluate the credibility of the new systems. This paper presents a new realistic testbed architecture of IoT network deployed at the IoT lab of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) at Canberra. The platform NSX vCloud NFV was employed to facilitate the execution of Software-Defined Network (SDN), Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and Service Orchestration (SO) to offer dynamic testbed networks, which allow the interaction of edge, fog and cloud tiers. While deploying the architecture, real-world normal and attack scenarios are executed to collect labeled datasets. The datasets are referred to as “ToN_IoT”, as they comprise heterogeneous data sources collected from telemetry datasets of IoT services, Windows and Linux-based datasets, and datasets of network traffic. The ToN_IoT network dataset is validated using four machine learning-based anomaly detection algorithms of Gradient Boosting Machine, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, and Deep Neural Networks, revealing a high performance of detection accuracy using the set of training and testing. These new datasets provide a realistic testbed of design, a variety of normal and attack events, heterogeneous data sources, and a ground truth table of security events. A comparative summary of the ToN_IoT network dataset and other competing network datasets demonstrates its diverse legitimate and anomalous patterns that can be used to better validate new AI-based security solutions. The datasets can be publicly accessed from ADFA (2020) .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102994

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 721

Metadata

Authors
Moustafa, N.
Venue
Sustainable Cities and Society
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
72
Pages
102994
ISSN
2210-6707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3162956350
Cited by
721
References
40
FWCI
36.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new distributed architecture for evaluating AI-based security systems at the edge: Network TON_IoT datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102994
The paper
Moustafa, N. (2021). A new distributed architecture for evaluating AI-based security systems at the edge: Network TON_IoT datasets. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.102994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.