The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding the Epidemiology and Progression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Open accessAbstract
Objectives This review examines the burden and patterns of disease in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and the influence and interactions of gender, ethnicity, age, and psychosocial attributes with respect to disease progression, focusing on issues relevant to clinical practice and research. Methods PubMed literature search complemented by review of bibliographies listed in identified articles. Results An increased risk among reproductive age women is clearly seen in African Americans in the United States. However, in other populations, a different pattern is generally seen, with the highest age-specific incidence rates occurring in women after age 40 years. The disease is 2 to 4 times more frequent, and more severe, among nonwhite populations around the world and tends to be more severe in men and in pediatric and late-onset lupus. SLE patients now experience a higher than 90% survival rate at 5 years. The less favorable survival experience of ethnic minorities is possibly related to socioeconomic status rather than to ethnicity per se, and adequate social support has been shown to be a protective factor, in general, in SLE patients. Discordance between physician and patient ratings of disease activity may affect quality of care. Conclusions Our understanding of ways to improve outcomes in SLE patients could benefit from patient-oriented research focusing on many dimensions of disease burden. Promising research initiatives include the inclusion of community-based patients in longitudinal studies, use of self-assessment tools for rating disease damage and activity, and a focus on self-perceived disease activity and treatment compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andrade, R. M., Alarcón, G. S., Fernández, M., Apte, M., Vilá, L. M., & Reveille, J. D. (2007) · Arthritis & Rheumatism · doi:10.1002/art.22375 · Cited by 184
Self-citationRisk for rheumatic disease in relation to ethnicity and admixture
Molokhia (2000) · Arthritis Research · doi:10.1186/ar76 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Superwoman Schema: African American Women’s Views on Stress, Strength, and Health
Woods-Giscombé, C. L. (2010) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732310361892 · Cited by 802
Lai, Z.-W., Kelly, R., Winans, T., Marchena, I., Shadakshari, A., Yu, J., Dawood, M., Garcia, R., Tily, H., Francis, L., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30485-9 · Cited by 412
Gordon, C., Amissah-Arthur, M.-B., Gayed, M., Brown, S., Bruce, I. N., D’Cruz, D., Empson, B., Griffiths, B., Jayne, D., Khamashta, M., et al. (2018) · Rheumatology · doi:10.1093/rheumatology/kex286 · Cited by 365
Immune senescence, epigenetics and autoimmunity
Ray, D., & Yung, R. (2018) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2018.04.002 · Cited by 219
Achaval, S. D., & Suarez-Almazor, M. E. (2010) · International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.2217/ijr.10.15 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Pons-Estel, G. J., Alarcón, G. S., Scofield, L., Reinlib, L., & Cooper, G. S.
- Venue
- Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-02
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 257-268
- ISSN
- 0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093076036
- Cited by
- 908
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding the Epidemiology and Progression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.007
- The paper
- Pons-Estel, G. J., Alarcón, G. S., Scofield, L., Reinlib, L., & Cooper, G. S. (2010). Understanding the Epidemiology and Progression of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.