Cited by 28Pain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain ManagementMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Use of prescription analgesic medication and pain catastrophizing after total joint replacement surgery

Valdes, Ana M., Warner, Sophie C., Harvey, Hollie L., Fernandes, Gwen S., Doherty, Sally, Jenkins, Wendy, Wheeler, Maggie, Doherty, Michael·2015·Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism

Abstract

Objective To survey the use of analgesic medication 4.8 years after total joint replacement (TJR) surgery and assess the determinants of medication usage.Patients and methods Of 852 patients who had undergone TJR for osteoarthritis were recruited from secondary care. Participants (mean age, 73.7 years) responded to a questionnaire on medication use, physical function and pain (WOMAC, VAS and body pain), pain catastrophizing and illness behaviour (somatization).Results Only 37% of study participants were not on any pain relief medication, 25.1% were taking opioids, 6.9% were taking prescription NSAIDs and 25.9% were taking only non-prescription analgesics. Use of NSAIDs correlated with presence of back pain, body pain and high illness behaviour. The strongest associations with use of opioids were severe joint pain, high pain catastrophizing, body and back pain. After adjustment for covariates plus presence of pain, catastrophizing remained significantly associated with higher risk of opioid use (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.13-2.43, p < 0.009) and of other prescription medication that can be used to treat pain (anti-depressants, anti-epileptics and hypnotics) (OR = 2.52, 95% CI: 1.61-3.95, p < 0.0005).Conclusions Use of opioid medication 4 years post-TJR is very high in our study population. In addition to joint, back and body pain, a major contributor to opioid use is pain catastrophizing. Our data suggest that current opioid and other analgesic prescribing patterns may benefit from considering the catastrophizing characteristics of patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.004

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valdes, A. M., Warner, S. C., Harvey, H. L., Fernandes, G. S., Doherty, S., Jenkins, W., Wheeler, M., & Doherty, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Nottingham City Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Valdes, Ana M.
Venue
Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
150-155
ISSN
0049-0172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1901587384
Cited by
28
References
27
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
total joint arthroplasty, pain catastrophizing, opioid use, prescription analgesics, osteoarthritis, chronic drug administration, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, back pain, somatization, antidepressants, hypnotics, analgesic prescribing
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analgesics, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Osteoarthritis, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Postoperative Pain, Treatment Outcome, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review