Cited by 2,472Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain

Sullivan, Michael J. L., Thorn, Beverly, Haythornthwaite, Jennifer A., Keefe, Francis, Martin, Michelle, Bradley, Laurence A., Lefebvre, John C.·2001·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

The tendency to "catastrophize" during painful stimulation contributes to more intense pain experience and increased emotional distress. Catastrophizing has been broadly conceived as an exaggerated negative "mental set" brought to bear during painful experiences. Although findings have been consistent in showing a relation between catastrophizing and pain, research in this area has proceeded in the relative absence of a guiding theoretical framework. This article reviews the literature on the relation between catastrophizing and pain and examines the relative strengths and limitations of different theoretical models that could be advanced to account for the pattern of available findings. The article evaluates the explanatory power of a schema activation model, an appraisal model, an attention model, and a communal coping model of pain perception. It is suggested that catastrophizing might best be viewed from the perspective of hierarchical levels of analysis, where social factors and social goals may play a role in the development and maintenance of catastrophizing, whereas appraisal-related processes may point to the mechanisms that link catastrophizing to pain experience. Directions for future research are suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200103000-00008

Cites

131 of 131 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain catastrophising is associated with increased use of healthcare services and longer hospital stays.

    “increased use of healthcare services and longer hospital stays [15,16]”
  • Pain catastrophizing has emerged as one of the most important predictors of pain, accounting for 7% to 31% of the variance in pain ratings.

    “Pain catastrophizing, the tendency to focus on pain and negatively evaluate one's ability to deal with pain, has emerged as one of the most important predictors of pain, accounting for 7% to 31% of the variance in pain ratings.27,119”
  • These findings fit with a communal model of catastrophizing that maintains that catastrophizing represents an interpersonal form of coping whose aim is to maintain proximity to and support from others.

    “These findings fit with a communal model of catastrophizing that maintains that catastrophizing represents an interpersonal form of coping whose aim is to maintain proximity to and support from others.119”
  • Pain-related catastrophizing is associated with heightened pain intensity, emotional distress, disability and pain-related behaviour.

    “Pain-related catastrophizing has been defined as a negative mental set activated by actual or anticipated pain, and is associated with heightened pain intensity, emotional distress, disability and pain-related behaviour (Sullivan et al., Citation2001).”
  • Generalized positive outcome expectancy, or dispositional optimism, is related to increased feelings of control, use of more active coping strategies, and better functional performance.

    “Generalized positive outcome expectancy, or dispositional optimism 348–350, is related to increased feelings of control, the use of more active coping strategies, and better functional performance 91, 351–353.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, M. J. L., Thorn, B., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Keefe, F., Martin, M., Bradley, L. A., & Lefebvre, J. C.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Michael J. L.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2001-03
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
52-64
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099493839
Cited by
2,472
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 98 · 2024: 113 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 134 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 117 · 2016: 129 · 2015: 124 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 140 · 2012: 117
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, pain perception, evaluation model, attention-based models, emotional distress, social factors in pain, levels of analysis
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Attention, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Models, Psychological, Pain, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review